Application Of Law And Criminal Accountability Against Violent Theft Offenders

Authors

  • Erfan Putra Pratama Universitas Darul Ulum Islamic Centre Sudirman GUPPI
  • Tri Susilowati Universitas Darul Ulum Islamic Centre Sudirman GUPPI

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v4i06.831

Keywords:

Role, Accountability, Perpetrator, Criminal, Violent theft

Abstract

The components of the wrongdoing of burglary with brutality are referenced in Article 365 of the Lawbreaker Code which should be met, for example in paragraph (1) "followed by violence to facilitate theft", paragraph (2) 1st "the theft was carried out at night", paragraph (2) 2nd "the theft is committed by two or more people together", paragraph (2) 3rd "by breaking or climbing, using fake keys, fake orders, or fake positions", paragraph ( 2) 4th "theft which caused another person to be seriously injured", paragraph (3) "caused death", paragraph (4) "caused another person to be seriously injured or died which was committed by two or more people together". Application of Law and Criminal Accountability Against Violent Theft Offenders in the Central Java Region. As made sense of in the clarification of the Lawbreaker Code (KUHPidana) in regards to the wrongdoing of robbery, it is recognized by different capabilities, incorporating as specified in Article 365 of the Crook Code, in particular burglary forcibly. Burglary with viciousness is a wrongdoing against property. The savagery committed in the robbery has the motivation behind getting ready or working with burglary or on the other hand assuming got there is a chance for the culprit to escape so the taken thing stays in the possession of the culprit. In law and criminal responsibility to perpetrators of theft with violence in the Central Java region. When analyzed by the formulation of offenses contained in the Criminal Code, the above crimes are included in Article 365 of the Criminal Code. It is because there is no definite understanding in the Criminal Code or other laws regarding what robbery, theft and mugging are, but these three forms of crime fulfill the formulation in Article 365 of the Criminal Code, namely theft by force.

References

Barda Nawawi Arief, S. H. (2018). Masalah penegakan hukum dan kebijakan hukum pidana dalam penanggulangan kejahatan. Prenada Media.

Batuwael, R. A. (2020). Fungsi Pidana Denda Dalam Sistem Pemidanaan Di Indonesia. Lex Crimen, 9(3).

Gardner, J. (2012). Law as a leap of faith: essays on law in general. Oxford University Press.

Hidayati, R., Herniwati, S. A., Josviranto, M., Ramadianto, A. Y., Heliany, I., Dumbaris, M. A. S., Daku, Y., Hermanto, A., Mariam, S., & Aisyah, S. (2022). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. CV Literasi Nusantara Abadi.

Kadri Husin, S., & Budi Rizki Husin, S. (2022). Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.

Lacey, N. (2016). In search of criminal responsibility: Ideas, interests, and institutions. Oxford University Press.

Maguire, M. (2016). 13 Restraining big brother? The regulation of surveillance in England and Wales. Surveillance, Closed Circuit Television and Social Control.

Qamar, N., Syarif, M., Busthami, D. S., Hidjaz, M. K., Aswari, A., Djanggih, H., & Rezah, F. S. (2017). Metode Penelitian Hukum (Legal Research Methods). CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn).

Sharp, R., Green, A., & Lewis, J. (2017). Education and social control: A study in progressive primary education (Vol. 49). Routledge.

Ulya, Z. (2021). DILEMATISASI REGULASI KELEMBAGAAN ANTAR LEMBAGA KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN DITINJAU MENURUT KONSEP CHECK AND BALANCES. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 10(3), 337–360. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.10.3.2021.337-360

Yulia, R. (2017). Restorative Justice Sebagai Alternatif Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 39(2), 238–254.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-04

How to Cite

Pratama, E. P., & Susilowati, T. . (2023). Application Of Law And Criminal Accountability Against Violent Theft Offenders. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, 4(06), 573–580. https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v4i06.831