An Analysis of Code Mixing and Code Switching on “Davyn Sudirdjo, Anak Indonesia Pencipta AI Untuk Pendidikan Helmy Yahya Bicara” Podcast

Jeni Ria Talu

doi:10.59141/jiss.v7i7.2438

Authors

Jeni Ria Talu Jakarta International University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v7i7.2438

Keywords:

Bilingual, Code Mixing, Code Switching, Function, Factor, Podcast, Sociolinguistic

Abstract

The increasing use of digital media has significantly influenced bilingual communication practices, particularly through platforms such as podcasts that provide spaces for spontaneous language interaction. In technology and educational discussions, speakers often combine Indonesian and English to express complex concepts, resulting in the emergence of code mixing and code-switching phenomena. This study aims to identify the types, forms, and functions of code mixing and code switching used in the podcast episode “Davyn Sudirdjo, Anak Indonesia Pencipta AI Untuk Pendidikan Helmy Yahya Bicara” This research employed a qualitative descriptive method. The data were collected by transcribing the entire podcast conversation and analyzing bilingual expressions based on Muysken’s (2000) theory of code mixing and Poplack’s (1980) theory of code switching. The findings reveal that code mixing occurred more frequently than code switching. A total of 23 instances of code mixing were identified, consisting of insertion (82.6%) and congruent lexicalization (17.4%), while alternation was not found. Meanwhile, 8 instances of code switching were discovered, including tag switching (50%), intra-sentential switching (37.5%), and inter-sentential switching (12.5%). The discussion indicates that English terms, especially those related to artificial intelligence and technology, were frequently incorporated to improve clarity, accuracy, and effectiveness in explaining specialized concepts. In conclusion, code mixing and code switching in the podcast function as strategic communication practices that support knowledge transfer, bilingual identity construction, and adaptation to global technological discourse.

References

Abilkassymova, А. (2025). Multilingual Discourse In Digital Space: A Study of The Kazakh-English Translanguaging on YouTube Podcasts. Bulletin of Shokan Ualikhanov Kokshetau University Philological Series, (2), 9-22.

Akfan, S. S. (2025). English communication challenges among Indonesian entrepreneurs: A sociolinguistic case study. APLIKATIF: Journal of Research Trends in Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(1), 39-51.

Alrajafi, G. (2021). The use of English in Indonesia: status and influence. SIGEH ELT: Journal of Literature and Linguistics, 1(1), 1-10.

Barnali, C. (2017). Code Switching and Mixing in Communication: A Study on Language Contact in Indian Media. SSRN Electronic Journal, 110–123.

Bauer, L. (2007). The Linguistics of Language. Edinburgh University Press.

Bhatia, T. K., & Ritchie, W. C. (Eds.). (2004). The Handbook of Bilingualism and Multilingualism. Wiley-Blackwell.

Brock-Utne, B. (2016). English as the language of science and technology. In Human rights in language and STEM education: Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (pp. 111-127). Rotterdam: SensePublishers.

Castro, C. M. C. (2009). The use and functions of discourse markers in EFL classroom interaction. Profile: Issues in Teachers' Professional Development, (11), 57-77.

Foyewa, R., et al. (2016). Language and Situation: An Examination in Nigeria. International Journal of Advanced Academic Research, 2(5), 8–14.

Grosjean, F. (2014). Processing mixed language: Issues, findings, and models. In Tutorials in bilingualism (pp. 225-254). Psychology Press.

Heredia, R. R., & Altarriba, J. (2001). Bilingual language mixing: Why do bilinguals code-switch?. Current directions in psychological science, 10(5), 164-168.

Kusumaningputri, R. (2024). Negotiating voices in English as a lingua franca: Indonesian multilingual identity in English digital interactions. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 45(10), 4554-4571.

Lee, C. (2015). Multilingual resources and practices in digital communication. In The Routledge handbook of language and digital communication (pp. 118-132). Routledge.

Mauranen, A. (2006). Signaling and preventing misunderstanding in English as lingua franca communication. International journal of the sociology of language, 177, 123. doi. org.

Montgomery, S. L. (2013). Does science need a global language?: English and the future of research. University of Chicago Press.

Muysken, P. (2000). Code-switching processes: Alternation, insertion, congruent lexicalization. Language choices: Conditions, constraints, and consequences, 20, 361 380.

Muysken, P. (2000). The study of code-mixing. Bilingual Speech: A Typology of Code-Mixing, 110.

Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (2011). Identity, language learning, and social change. Language teaching, 44(4), 412-446.

Nahak, Y., & Bram, B. (2022). Code Mixing and Switching Uttered by Cinta Laura in Okay Boss. Journey: Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 5(1), 120–134. doi. org.

Pawlak, M. (2018). Investigating the use of speaking strategies in the performance of two communicative tasks: The importance of communicative goals. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 269-291.

Poplack, S. (1980). Sometimes I'll start a sentence in Spanish y la termino en español. Linguistics, 18, 581-618.

Rahmani, H., & Karimi, M. I. (2025). The impact of globalization and modern technology on the English language. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 7(2), 31–41.

Smit, T. C. (2006). Listening comprehension in academic lectures: A focus on the role of discourse markers. University of South Africa (South Africa).

Yuliana, N., Luziana, A. R., & Sarwendah, P. (2015). Code Mixing and Switching in Indonesian Celebrities. Lingua Cultura, 9(1), 47–54.