The Fiscal Paradox and the Performance of Irrigation Infrastructure: A National Analysis of the Relationship Between Operational and Maintenance Funding and the Sustainability of Local Irrigation Assets

Irma Rahmawati

doi:10.59141/jiss.v7i6.2381

Authors

Irma Rahmawati Pusat Fasilitasi Infrastruktur Daerah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v7i6.2381

Keywords:

Irrigation, AKNOP, IKSI, capacity fiscal, deferred maintenance

Abstract

Irrigation operation and maintenance (OP) management is a key factor in the sustainability of water resource infrastructure services and national food security. In Indonesia, the gap between actual maintenance needs and regional budgeting capabilities remains a major issue. This study analyzes the relationship between regional fiscal capacity, the fulfillment of the Actual Operation and Maintenance Needs (AKNOP), and the achievement of the Irrigation System Performance Index (IKSI) in irrigation areas under regional authority during the 2023–2025 period. Using a mixed-methods approach, the study combines quantitative analysis of national data with a literature review, a survey of OPD perceptions, and practitioner assessments. The results show that high fiscal capacity does not always correlate with irrigation system performance; some regions with large budgets still have low IKSI, while regions with limited budgets are able to maintain services by utilizing the remaining life of the infrastructure. This phenomenon reflects a fiscal paradox, where the problem is more about governance weaknesses than budget limitations. Using the Risk Quadrant Matrix, the study identifies four typologies of irrigation management: acute crisis, governance inefficiency, latent risk, and sustainable zones. The weak integration of AKNOP technical data with the regional budgeting system has created information asymmetry between technical and fiscal units. Recommendations include digital integration of e-AKNOP with the Regional Government Information System (SIPD), strengthening mandatory spending based on infrastructure risk, and revitalizing irrigation OP institutions. These reforms are expected to drive the transformation of irrigation management from a construction-oriented paradigm to an asset-management one.

References

Alaerts, G. J. (2019). Financing for water—Water for financing: A global review of policy and practice. Sustainability, 11(3), 821.

American Society of Civil Engineers. (2021). Report card for America’s infrastructure: A guide to asset management. ASCE.

Detter, D., & Fölster, S. (2016). The public wealth of nations: How management of public assets can boost or bust economic growth. Springer.

Flanagan, R., & Norman, G. (1983). Life cycle costing for construction. Surveyors Publications.

Flyvbjerg, B. (2014). What you should know about megaprojects and why: An overview. Project Management Journal, 45(2), 6–19.

Frangopol, D. M., & Liu, M. (2019). Maintenance and management of civil infrastructure based on condition, safety, optimization, and life-cycle cost. In Structures and infrastructure systems (pp. 96–108).

Gany, A. H. A., Sharma, P., & Singh, S. (2019). Global review of institutional reforms in the irrigation sector for sustainable agricultural water management, including water users’ associations. Irrigation and Drainage, 68(1), 84–97.

Givoni, M., & Perl, A. (2017). Complexity and public policy: A new approach to 21st century governance. Routledge.

Grigg, N. S. (2010). Infrastructure health care: A guide to investment and management. American Water Works Association.

Guo, Y. E. (2025). Out of sight, out of budget: The invisibility crisis in U.S. infrastructure maintenance.

Irazábal, C. (2018). Coastal urban planning in the “Green Republic”: Tourism development and the nature–infrastructure paradox in Costa Rica. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 42(5), 882–913.

Kim, J. (2022). Don’t pass deferred maintenance costs to the next generation! The effects of politics on state highway maintenance spending. Public Works Management & Policy, 27(2), 127–151.

Kim, K. (2023). Analysing Indonesia’s infrastructure deficits from a developmentalist perspective. Competition & Change, 27(1), 115–142.

Lewis, T. G. (2019). Critical infrastructure protection in homeland security: Defending a networked nation. John Wiley & Sons.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). Subnational governments in OECD countries: Key data. OECD Publishing.

Ramakrishnan, K., O’Reilly, K., & Budds, J. (2021). The temporal fragility of infrastructure: Theorizing decay, maintenance, and repair. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 4(3), 674–695.

Robinson, M. (2015). Budgeting and budgetary institutions. World Bank Group.

Sirait, N. D. (2024). Transformasi tata kelola dan keberlanjutan infrastruktur di Indonesia. Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat.

Stiglitz, Joseph E., & Rosengard, J. K. (2015). Economics of the public sector (4th ed.). W. W. Norton & Company.

Wildavsky, A. (1986). Budgeting: A comparative theory of budgetary processes. Transaction Books.

Zidan, A., Khairalla, M., Abdrabou, A. M., Khalifa, T., Shaban, K., Abdrabou, A., El Shatshat, R., & Gaouda, A. M. (2016). Fault detection, isolation, and service restoration in distribution systems: State-of-the-art and future trends. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 8(5), 2170–2185.