Enhancing Parameter Precision in PLS-SEM through Methodological Refinement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v7i3.2256Keywords:
model evaluation, methodological refinement, parameter precision, PLS-SEM, predictive accuracyAbstract
Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) is widely utilised owing to its flexibility in handling complex models, small sample sizes, and non-normal data distributions. However, many empirical studies continue to rely on outdated or incomplete evaluation procedures, which can compromise parameter precision and lead to biased conclusions. This study aims to enhance parameter precision in PLS-SEM by proposing a comprehensive methodological refinement framework aligned with contemporary best practices. Using a systematic methodological review and conceptual synthesis of PLS-SEM studies published between 2014 and 2024, this research identifies recurring weaknesses in the assessment of measurement models, discriminant validity, structural models, and model fit indices. The findings demonstrate that parameter precision is substantially improved through flexible indicator assessment, rigorous discriminant validity testing, comprehensive structural model evaluation, and modern model fit diagnostics. The proposed refinement framework integrates updated thresholds and evaluation metrics across the outer model and inner model, emphasising predictive relevance and robustness over rigid cut-off rules. By consolidating these methodological improvements into a unified framework, this study bridges the gap between advanced methodological guidelines and prevailing empirical practice. The results provide clear guidance for researchers across disciplines in obtaining more accurate, reliable, and unbiased parameter estimates when applying PLS-SEM, thereby strengthening both theoretical inference and practical decision-making.
References
Ahmad, R. (2023). Quantifying the impact of measurement errors in consistent linear partial least squares structural equation modelling: A Monte Carlo investigation, 5(4), 905–923.
Ali, F., Rasoolimanesh, S. M., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Ryu, K. (2017). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in hospitality research. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29, 1–48.
Batra, S. (2025). Exploring the application of PLS-SEM in construction management research: A bibliometric and meta-analysis approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(4), 2697–2727.
Cheung, G. W., Cooper-Thomas, H. D., Lau, R. S., & Wang, L. C. (2024). Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 41(2), 745–783.
Chinnaraju, A. (2025). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in the AI era: Innovative methodological guide and framework for business research, 13(2), 62–108.
Dash, G., & Paul, J. (2021). CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121092
Demir, S., & Uşak, M. (2025). Analyzing the implementation of PLS-SEM in educational technology research: A review of the past 10 years. SAGE Open, 15(2), 21582440251345950.
Franke, G., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: A comparison of four procedures. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-12-2017-0515
Guenther, P., Guenther, M., Ringle, C. M., & Zaefarian, G. (2023). Improving PLS-SEM use for business marketing research. Industrial Marketing Management, 111, 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2023.03.010
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Henseler, J., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling. Computational Statistics, 28(2), 565–580.
Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10.
Magno, F., Cassia, F., & Ringle, C. M. (2024). A brief review of partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) use in quality management studies. The TQM Journal, 36(5), 1242–1251.
Nagwovuma, M., Maiga, G., & Nakakawa, A. (2024). Discriminant validity of factors for evaluating performance of eHealth information systems. In Rethinking ICT adoption theories in the developing world: Information and communication technologies (pp. 47–70). Springer.
Panzeri, A., Castelnuovo, G., & Spoto, A. (2024). Assessing discriminant validity through structural equation modeling: The case of eating compulsivity. Nutrients, 16(4), 550.
Shela, V., Ramayah, T., Aravindan, K. L., Ahmad, N. H., & Alzahrani, A. I. (2023). Run! This road has no ending! A systematic review of PLS-SEM application in strategic management research among developing nations. Heliyon, 9(12).
Singh, P., & Anthonysamy, L. (2025). Development and validation of an instrument to assess instructors’ usage, acceptance, and confidence towards ChatGPT: A reliability and discriminant validity analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 30(17), 25251–25271.
Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y. M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48(1), 159–205.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lisana Sumarah Pratignyo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.




