Revisiting Objectivity and its Application in the Modern Era
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v7i2.2206Keywords:
Objective, Methodological, Paradigm, Innovation, Critical ThinkingAbstract
This paper revisits objectivism and its relevance in the present. Objectivism is an understanding that believes in the process of thinking objectively and epistemically, and seeks to find factual truth, which is the truth that is found if a scientist or researcher does not inject interpretation into the object being interpreted. Modern science is very strongly attached to the notion of objectivism. This can be seen from how modern science, with all its methodological and empirical advantages, is able to answer many of the world’s problems. Thus, modern science has earned an honorable position in this world. However, the power of modern science in all its methodological and empirical forms has been criticized by three thinkers, namely Thomas Kuhn, Paul K. Feyerabend, and Richard Rorty. These three critics challenge the methodology and emphasize that nothing is purely objective. Thomas Kuhn emphasizes the existence of paradigms that influence researchers; Feyerabend stresses the need to open up space for creativity; Richard Rorty highlights the role of language and argues that something can be called truth if it is useful and situated in a particular temporal context. What these critics note has been addressed by the development of modern science today, through the recognition of paradigms and the openness of scientific methods to support innovation. Today, the word “objective” is used in the process of critical thinking. Critical thinking uses an objective process to select, test, and criticize information based on criteria regarding whether the information is valid and true, or merely a hoax. Therefore, the process of objective thinking today is still relevant to be used in the context of critical thinking.
References
Anichini, G., & Kotras, B. (2024). Trained judgements: Artificial intelligence, epistemic tensions and the production of scientific objectivity. Science, Technology, & Human Values. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/
Barth, Y., & Weinberg, D. (2024). The diffusion of diagnosis and its implications for the epistemology and ontology of disease. Sociology of Health & Illness, 46(S1), 76–91.
Benton, T., & Craib, I. (2023). Philosophy of social science: The philosophical foundations of social thought. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Bontcheva, K., Papadopoulous, S., Tsalakanidou, F., Gallotti, R., Dutkiewicz, L., Krack, N., Teyssou, D., Severio Nucci, F., Spangenberg, J., & Srba, I. (2024). Generative AI and disinformation: Recent advances, challenges, and opportunities.
Essien, E. O. (2025). Climate change disinformation on social media: A meta-synthesis on epistemic welfare in the post-truth era. Social Sciences, 14(5), 304.
Garaschuk, D. V. (2024). Digital echo chambers: Amplifying populist rhetoric in the age of social media. Current Problems of Philosophy and Sociology, 46, 152–157.
Ghiurău, D., & Popescu, D. E. (2024). Distinguishing reality from AI: Approaches for detecting synthetic content. Computers, 14(1), 1.
Hardiman, F. B. (2021). Aku klik maka aku ada. Kanisius.
Harker, D. (2015). Creating scientific controversies: Uncertainty and bias in science and society. Cambridge University Press.
Kelkar, S. (2019). Post-truth and the search for objectivity: Political polarization and the remaking of knowledge production. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 5, 86–106.
Kumar, S., Sai, S., Chamola, V., Gaur, A., Agarwal, C., Huang, K., & Hussain, A. (2025). Peeping into the future: Understanding and combating generative AI-based fake news. Cognitive Computation, 17(3), 103.
Lovi, S. (2025). Digital disinformation and democratic destabilization: Mechanisms, risks and prospects for counteracting it. Zoon Politikon, 16, 1–32.
Mandavilli, S. R. (2023). Unleashing the potential of the “sociology of science”: Capitalizing on the power of science to usher in social, cultural and intellectual revolutions across the world and lay the foundations of twenty-first century pedagogy. Cultural and Intellectual Revolutions Across the World and Lay the Foundations of Twenty-First Century Pedagogy.
McCarthy, G. E. (2025). Shadows of the Enlightenment: The hidden politics and ideology of the natural and social sciences. NYU Press.
Ødemark, J., & Engebretsen, E. (2022). Challenging medical knowledge translation: Convergence and divergence of translation across epistemic and cultural boundaries. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 1–7.
Ritchie, S. (2020). Science fictions: How fraud, bias, negligence, and hype undermine the search for truth. Metropolitan Books.
Tacanho, M. (2025). The ethical foundations of economics: Beyond the myth of value-free social science.
Tillman, B. (2025). Fake news, real consequences: Examining young adults’ perceptions of post-truth politics and its implications for public policy.
Wang, Y. (2023). Synthetic realities in the digital age: Navigating the opportunities and challenges of AI-generated content. Authorea Preprints.
Zaman, A. (2015). Deification of science and its disastrous consequences. International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education, 6(2), 181–197.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kornelius Widyawan Haryanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
