Legal Protection for Auction Winners Regarding Objects of Encumbrance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v6i10.2068Keywords:
Regulation, Legal protection for auction winnersAbstract
After the payment for the auction object is made by the buyer to the auction seller, the purpose is to repay the debtor’s debt to the creditor. This study examines the Auction Regulation for the Execution of Guarantee Rights and its alignment with the principles of fairness, focusing on the obstacles faced by auction winners when debtors refuse to vacate the collateral property. The research uses the constructivism paradigm, which views legal science as dealing primarily with laws and regulations. The research approach is social legal research, employing a normative legal research method—also known as literature law research or doctrinal law research—because this study is conducted through library research consisting of legal materials and supported by secondary legal sources. The research findings show that the regulation of the execution of rights of dependents has not been fair due to Article 20 of the Law on the Rights of Dependents and Articles 200 and 224 of the HIR. Article 6 of Law No. 4 of 1996 and the Regulation of the Minister of Finance, as well as Law No. 12 of 2011, are also relevant. Furthermore, weaknesses in the regulations include the contradiction between the legal substance of Article 6 of the HT Law and the explanation of Article 26 of the Law on the Rights of Dependents. The implementation of execution is also based on Article 224 of the HIR.
References
Akmal, D. U. (2023). Indonesian State of Law: The Essence of Human Rights Protection in the Establishment of Laws and Regulation. Primagraha Law Review, 1(1), 1–11.
Al Ghani, M. A., & Tanawijaya, H. (2024). Settlement of Bad Loans with Guarantee of Dependent Rights at Banks and Auction Houses Based on the Law on Dependent Rights No. 4 of 1996 (Case Study: Decision No. 550/Pdt/2019/PT MDN). Advances In Social Humanities Research, 2(7).
Anshar, S., & Netrivianti, N. (2024). The Essence of Legislation in Realizing a Legal State Based on Justice and Welfare. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekotrans Dan Erudisi, 4(1), 109–115.
Brown, R., & Pressley, M. (2023). Self-regulated reading and getting meaning from text: The transactional strategies instruction model and its ongoing validation. In Self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 155–179). Routledge.
Fauzia, A., Hamdani, F., & Octavia, D. (2021). The revitalization of the Indonesian legal system in the order of realizing the ideal state law. Progressive Law Review, 3(01), 12–25.
Fuad, F., Tardjono, H., Machmud, A., Rohayah, N., & Maghucu, P. (2023). Ownership of Land: Legal Philosophy and Culture Analysis of Land Property Rights. Jurnal Media Hukum, 30(2), 98–116.
Handitya, B. (2021). Redesign The Relevance Of Justice In Debtor Protection Related To Parate Executions Performed By Separate Creditors In Liability Agreements. Jurnal Akta, 8(4), 222–229.
Handoko, W. (2021). Debtor Protection in Perspective of Pancasila Justice Value on Separatic Creditor Executions. International Journal of Law Reconstruction, 5(1), 93–103.
Hendrawan, D., Haspada, D., & Tiopan, D. (2023). Legal Protection for Creditors in Bankruptcy Law: Implementing the Bankrupt Boedel Execution. Croatian International Relations Review, 29(92), 108–124.
Iqbal, Z., Sohail, H., & Mahmood, M. R. (2025). Land, Law and Legacy: Exploring the Educational Effects of Colonial Land Policies and Present-Day Property Disputes. Archives of Educational Studies (ARES), 5(1), 14–33.
Juanda, O. (2023). The Ideal Law State Concept in Indonesia; The Reality and The Solution. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 3(2), 251–262.
Komara, S., & Adjie, H. (2023). The Effect of the Execution of the Sale of the Right Object on the Position of Bank Creditors. Edunity: Social and Educational Studies, 2(5), 630–638.
Marin, L. (2022). Enactive principles for the ethics of user interactions on social media: How to overcome systematic misunderstandings through shared meaning-making. Topoi, 41(2), 425–437.
Morgan, H. (2022). Understanding thematic analysis and the debates involving its use. The Qualitative Report, 27(10), 2079–2090.
Muslim, S., Hadiwinata, K., & Mundzir, H. (2021). Legal Protection for Winners of Dependent Rights Execution Auctions Through Parate Executie. JL Pol’y & Globalization, 114, 28.
Octavian, V. (2024). Legal Protection of Auction Winners Against the Execution of Dependent Rights. Advances In Social Humanities Research, 2(6), 798–813.
Omozue, M. O. (2025). Balancing State Power and Human Rights: A Jurisprudential Analysis of Pandemic Containment Measures in Nigeria. NIU Journal of Legal Studies, 11(1), 103–114.
Panjaitan, M. J. (2021). Legal politics to build a state of happiness: an idea in a state based on the 1945 constitution. International Journal, 10, 487.
Pertiwi, M. D., Firdausy, A. G., & Kharisma, D. B. (2024). Problematics of Land Dispute Resolution in Indonesia. Proceedings of the International Conference for Democracy and National Resilience (ICDNR 2024), 30, 94.
Pontoh, S. C., & Sudirman, M. (2024). Implementation of Parate Executie Based on Article 6 of Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Guarantee of Dependent Rights to the Auction of Objects of Dependent Rights. Syntax Idea, 6(7), 3237–3243.
Retnowati, T., Boediningsih, W., & Irwansyah, M. G. (2023). Execution of The Object of Dependent Rights Through Auction Based On The Principle of Proportionality. Eduvest-Journal of Universal Studies, 3(2), 455–464.
Rusmana, R. A. G., Irawan, H. M. F., & Maskanah, U. (2025). Legal Protection for Auction Winners Whose Items Are Still Held by The Debtor According to Law Number 4 of 2004 on Auctions. Golden Ratio of Data in Summary, 5(1), 150–159.
Sahda, R. A., Suryono, A., & Kusumo, A. T. S. (2025). Justice in Article 21 of the Law on Dependent Rights and Article 56 Paragraph (1) of the Bankruptcy Law for Creditors and Debtors. International Journal of Integrative Sciences, 4(3), 568–577.
Sianipar, J. R., & Prasetyawati, E. (2024). Legal Protection for Debtors When There Is a Transfer Of Debt By Creditors Without The Debtor’s Consent. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(2), 44–48.
Soman, M. (2025). Review of Legal Protection Against Auction Winners in Good Faith Against Auctions of Lien Assets Sued by Debtors. Fox Justi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 15(02), 365–371.
Soraya, D. (2021). Legal Protection of Disadvantaged Debtor Customers in the Implementation of Object Execution Auction Procedures in Bank Credit Agreements. Indonesia Private Law Review, 2(1), 37–48.
Suwadi, P., Ayuningtyas, P. W., Septiningrum, S. Y., & Manthovani, R. (2024). Legal comparison of the use of telemedicine between Indonesia and the United States. International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare, 17(3), 315–329.
Tampubolon, M. (2025). Decoding Legal Ambiguity: the Interplay between Law and Legal Semiotics in Modern Jurisprudence. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law-Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique, 1–29.
Widiarto, A. E., Hassan, M. S., Rusli, M. H. M., & Setiawan, E. B. (2025). The authority relationship of Central and Local Governments in forming laws and regulations: between Indonesia and Malaysia. Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 33(1), 148–167.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Taufik Pandan Winoto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
