Russia’s Energy Sovereignty: Vladimir Putin’s Leadership Autarky and its Relevance to Indonesia’s National Defense

Authors

  • Dadang Hermawan Sekolah Staf dan Komando Tentara Nasional Indonesia
  • Prasetyo Pinandito Sekolah Staf dan Komando Tentara Nasional Indonesia
  • Tarsisius Susilo Sekolah Staf dan Komando Tentara Nasional Indonesia
  • Budi Saroso Sekolah Staf dan Komando Tentara Nasional Indonesia Email:
  • Benny Leonardo Limbong Sekolah Staf dan Komando Tentara Nasional Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v6i10.2045

Keywords:

Vladimir Putin, Autarky, Energy Sovereignty, Strategic Leadership, Defense Doctrine, Indonesia

Abstract

Russia's energy sovereignty under Vladimir Putin demonstrates how strategic resource control can serve as both a foundation for national defense and a tool for geopolitical influence. This study examines Putin's autarky leadership model—characterized by centralized energy governance, economic nationalism, and the integration of energy policy with military strategy and explores its relevance to Indonesia's defense modernization toward Golden Indonesia 2045. Using a qualitative descriptive approach with library research methodology, this study analyzes secondary data from government documents, defense white papers, and academic literature published between 2015-2025. The analysis reveals that Putin's leadership consolidates energy (oil and natural gas) as a dual instrument: funding defense modernization and enabling coercive diplomacy, particularly through pipeline projects like Nord Stream. This approach combines classical realism with economic nationalism to reduce external dependency and maintain strategic autonomy. For Indonesia, the study identifies critical lessons: the necessity of integrating energy independence with defense doctrine, developing a resource-based defense industry, and establishing ethical leadership frameworks rooted in Pancasila values. Key recommendations include: strengthening national energy policy as a defense asset, promoting local content in defense technology, designing an adaptive defense doctrine based on natural resource sovereignty, and building energy diplomacy to enhance Indo-Pacific stability. Unlike Russia's centralized autarky, Indonesia's model should emphasize collaborative sovereignty balancing national independence with democratic accountability, environmental sustainability, and social justice. This research contributes to strategic leadership literature by connecting energy geopolitics with defense philosophy in an ASEAN context.

References

Ang, B. W., Choong, W. L., & Ng, T. S. (2015). Energy security: Definitions, dimensions and indexes. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 42, 1077–1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.064

Bompard, E., Carpignano, A., Erriquez, M., Grosso, D., Pession, M., & Profumo, F. (2017). National energy security assessment in a geopolitical perspective. Energy, 130, 144–154.

Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (2016). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. Strategic Management Journal, 37(2), 368–393.

Gerras, S. J. (Ed.). (2015). Strategic leadership primer (3rd ed.). U.S. Army War College Press, Department of Command, Leadership, and Management.

Gindarsah, I., & Priamarizki, A. (2024). Indonesia's defense modernization toward Golden Indonesia 2045: Strategic challenges and opportunities. Asian Security, 20(1), 78–95.

Goldthau, A., Westphal, K., Bazilian, M., & Bradshaw, M. (2019). How the energy transition will reshape geopolitics. Nature, 569, 29–31. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01312-5

Gustafson, T. (2021). Klimat: Russia in the age of climate change. Harvard University Press.

Helleiner, E. (2021). The return of national self-sufficiency? Excavating autarkic thought in a de-globalizing era. International Studies Review, 23(3), 933–960. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viaa092

Khrushcheva, O., & Snetkov, A. (2018). The controversy of Putin's energy policy: The problem of foreign investment and Russia's energy sector development. Central European Journal of International and Security Studies, 12(4), 448–473.

Kuik, C. C. (2021). ASEAN's defense diplomacy: Strategic hedging in the Indo-Pacific. International Affairs, 97(4), 1097–1116.

Lo, B. (2023). Russia and the new world disorder. Brookings Institution Press.

McCrone, D. (2021). Resource nationalism and energy transitions: Mobilization of local opposition to wind energy in Scotland. Energy Policy, 148, 111939.

Mitrova, T., & Yermakov, V. (2019). Energy as a weapon: Russia's role in the global energy market. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.

Pant, H. V., & Joshi, Y. (2020). Atmanirbhar Bharat: India's quest for strategic autonomy and defense self-reliance. Strategic Analysis, 44(6), 481–487.

Pascual, C., & Zambetakis, E. (2019). The new geopolitics of energy and climate. Energy Strategy Reviews, 26, 100387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.100387

Rutland, P. (2015). Putin's economic architecture: Between crony capitalism and state capitalism. Post-Soviet Affairs, 31(2), 87–103.

Sukma, R. (2022). Pertahanan Indonesia di era disrupsi global: Strategi, energi, dan kemandirian nasional. LIPI Press.

Wilson, J. D. (2015). Understanding resource nationalism: Economic dynamics and political institutions. Contemporary Politics, 21(4), 399–416.

Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson Education.

Zhao, X., & Chen, W. (2022). Energy-defense nexus in China's Belt and Road Initiative: Strategic implications for national security. Energy Policy, 168, 113156.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-16

How to Cite

Hermawan, D., Pinandito, P. ., Susilo, T. ., Saroso, B. ., & Limbong , B. L. . (2025). Russia’s Energy Sovereignty: Vladimir Putin’s Leadership Autarky and its Relevance to Indonesia’s National Defense. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, 6(10), 3218–3228. https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v6i10.2045