Implementasi Barang Bukti Petunjuk Oleh Hakim dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan

Authors

  • Noor Sulistiyono Universitas Diponogoro Semarang, Indonesia
  • Fadjrin Wira Perdana Universitas Diponegoro Semarang
  • Irwan Irwan Universitas Diponegoro Semarang
  • Doharman Lumban Tungkup Universitas Diponegoro Semarang
  • Miran Miran Universitas Diponegoro Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v3i10.722

Keywords:

Evidence, Decision, Criminal, Murder

Abstract

Indonesia is a legal state where all forms of citizen actions have legal consequences. Public law in Indonesia consists of criminal law and civil law. One of the criminal laws is murder. In the process of resolving cases of murder crimes, evidence is required. One of the evidence used is evidence of instructions. The purpose of this study is to examine the use of evidence as one of the judges' considerations in giving a decision. This research uses descriptive qualitative method with juridical-normative approach and literature study. The data used are secondary data taken from various literatures and scientific publications. The results showed that in several cases of murder in several District Courts, judges used evidence as a basis for consideration in giving criminal law decisions. Several District Courts in Indonesia that use evidence as a judge's consideration in making decisions include the Solok District Court, Padangsidimpuan District Court, Semarang District Court, and Simalungun District Court.      

References

Amaliyah, A., Ma’ruf, M. A., Sary, N., & Bitu, S. G. (2021). Reforma Agraria dan Penanganan Sengketa Tanah. HERMENEUTIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(1).

Azhar, H. (2020). Alat Bukti Petunjuk Dalam Hukum Pidana Islam. Al-’Adalah: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum Islam, 5(2), 163–183.

Bisyri, M., Sholehuddin, S., & Widoyoko, W. D. (2020). Problematika Positivisme Hukum Dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional di Indonesia. Dekrit, 10(2), 153–164.

Hernawati, R. A. S., & Durahman, D. (2020). Aspek Hukum dalam Penyelenggaraan Bisnis Perhotelan. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi, 20(3), 1033–1037.

Kadarwati, N., Setiasih, E., & IMP, R. (2015). Ketimpangan Pendapatan dan Keuangan Daerah di kabupaten Purbalingga. EKO-REGIONAL, Vol.10, No.2, 10(2).

Kaligis, J. (2013). Penerapan Alat Bukti Petunjuk Oleh Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan. Lex Crimen, 2(4).

Muksin, M. R. S., & Rochaeti, N. (2020). Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menggunakan Keterangan Ahli Kedokteran Forensik Sebagai Alat Bukti Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 2(3), 343–358.

Nasution, A. P., Wibowo, E. A., Puspita, L., Efendi, Y., Firdaus, R., Hamta, F., Hidayat, M., Yana, S., Ismarti, I., & Setyobudi, Y. F. (2018). Isu dan Masalah Lingkungan Hidup. Artikel Dan Opini Ade Parlaungan Nasution, 1(1).

Ningrat, S. P. (2020). Kekuatan Alat Bukti Petunjuk Dalam Pembuktian Perkara Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Dan Pemerkosaan (Studi Kasus No. 302/Pid. B/2015/PN. Stabat). UMSU.

Putri, K. S. W., Suhartono, S., & Michael, T. (2021). Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Kepada Pelanggar Protokol Kesehatan Di Tengan Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Akrab Juara, 6(2), 214–231.

Rosaniati, R., Sanyoto, S., & Bintoro, R. W. (2021). Penerapan Saksi Ahli Linguistik Forensik Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Tindak Pidana Turut Serta Menyiarkan Berita Bohong dan Menimbulkan Keonaran Terkait Hasil Swab Test (Studi Putusan Nomor 225/PID. SUS/2021/PN. JKT. Soedirman Law Review, 3(4).

Subagyo, A. (2018). Syarat-syarat kesiapan penyelenggaraan program Bela Negara. Jurnal Pertahanan & Bela Negara, 5(3), 1–20.

Sukarna, K. (2015). Alat Bukti Petunjuk dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana.

Susanto, E. H. (2017). Kelambanan Reformasi Birokrasi dan Pola Komunikasi Lembaga Pemerintah. Jurnal Aspikom, 1(1), 109–123.

Susanto, N. A. (2014). Dimensi Aksiologis Dari Putusan Kasus “St.” Jurnal Yudisial, 7(3), 213–235.

Usman, A. H. (2015). Kesadaran hukum masyarakat dan pemerintah sebagai faktor tegaknya negara hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, 30(1), 26–53. https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v30i1.74

Wijayanto, I., & Iriani, S. S. (2013). Pengaruh citra merek terhadap loyalitas konsumen. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, 1(3), 910–918.

Downloads

Published

2022-10-20

How to Cite

Sulistiyono, N., Perdana, F. W. ., Irwan, I., Tungkup, D. L. ., & Miran, M. (2022). Implementasi Barang Bukti Petunjuk Oleh Hakim dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, 3(10), 1424–1432. https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v3i10.722

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 10 (2022): Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Noor Sulistiyono, Fadjrin Wira Perdana, Irwan Irwan, Doharman Lumban Tungkup, Miran Miran

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.