Penerapan Alat Bukti Petunjuk Oleh Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan

Authors

  • Broto Priyono Universitas Diponogoro Semarang, Indonesia
  • Fadjrin Wira Perdana Universitas Diponogoro Semarang
  • Irwan Irwan Universitas Diponogoro Semarang
  • Doharman Lumban Tungkup Universitas Diponogoro Semarang
  • Miran Miran Universitas Diponogoro Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v3i10.721

Keywords:

Evidence of Appointment, Judge, Court Decision, Crime

Abstract

Every Indonesian citizen has the right to live and continue his life. Unfortunately, criminal acts that violate the right to life of citizens still occur even though this has been regulated firmly in the Criminal Code chapter XIX articles 338-350, such as acts of murder that are still carried out by citizens against other citizens. . If this is allowed, then the name of the rule of law is just a name without any act of justice that can deter and minimize crime. Judges as decision-makers in court certainly have an important role in upholding justice, but judges' decisions must be strengthened by various evidences. Therefore, the researcher wants to find out more about the application of evidence guided by the judge in passing the verdict on the crime of murder. The purpose of this study is to determine the important role of evidence guided by judges in making court decisions against the crime of murder. The research method used is descriptive qualitative with interview, documentation, and observation techniques at Court X in city Y. After the data is obtained, it can be analyzed to find out the results of the study which show that evidence indicates an important role for judges in deciding a criminal case. homicide by 80%. With this, the other 20% is influenced by other factors, both internal and external factors.

References

Aditya, Z. F. (2019). Romantisme Sistem Hukum Di Indonesia: Kajian Atas Konstribusi Hukum Adat Dan Hukum Islam Terhadap Pembangunan Hukum Di Indonesia. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 8(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v8i1.305

Haryadi, W. (2020). Rancangan Undang-Undang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (Ruu Kuhp) Di Indonesia Perspektif Teori Pembaharuan Hukum. Veritas, 6(1), 65–78. Https://Doi.Org/10.34005/Veritas.V6i1.566

Heliany, I. (2019). Peran Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Badanterhadap Anak Yang Berkonflik Dengan Hukum. Sol Justisio, 1(1 April), 42–49. Http://Jurnal.Mputantular.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Sj/Article/View/212

Hutahaean, A., & Indarti, E. (2019). Lembaga Penyidik Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu Di Indonesia. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 16(1), 27–41. Http://Download.Garuda.Kemdikbud.Go.Id/Article.Php?Article=949494&Val=14663&Title=Lembaga Penyidik Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu Di Indonesia

Insani, M. F., Rusmana, A., & Hakim, Z. (2021). Kecemasan Orangtua Terhadap Masa Depan Anak Penyandang Disabilitas Intelektual Di Slb C Bina Asih Cianjur. Jurnal Ilmiah Rehabilitasi Sosial (Rehsos), 3(1), 40–57. Https://Doi.Org/10.31595/Rehsos.V3i1.377

Irfan, M., & Faniyah, I. (2020). Kekuatan Pembuktian Alat Bukti Petunjuk Pada Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana. UNES Journal of Swara Justisia, 4(2), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.31933/ujsj.v4i2.156

Iskandar, I. (2017). Fungsi Hukum dan Penyebab Permasalahan Hukum di dalam Masyarakat Indonesia. Jurnal Serambi Akademica, 5(2), 106–112. https://doi.org/10.32672/jsa.v7i2

Kadir, A. (2018). Relevansi Alat Bukti Informasi Elektronik Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana Di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Replik, 6(2), 152–165. https://doi.org/10.31000/jhr.v6i2.1442.g897

Kholiq, A. (2018). Peranan Hakim dalam Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dan Dinamika Masyarakat, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.36356/hdm.v15i2.689

Larasatie, A., Fauziah, M., Dihartawan, D., Herdiansyah, D., & Ernyasih, E. (2022). Faktor-Faktor Yang Berhubungan Dengan Tindakan Tidak Aman (Unsafe Action) Pada Pekerja Produksi PT. X. Environmental Occupational Health And Safety Journal, 2(2), 133–146. https://jurnal.umj.ac.id/index.php/EOHSJ/article/viewFile/12160/6889

Mulkan, H. (2021). Peranan Hakim Dalam Persidangan Perkara Pidana Sebagai Upaya Penegakan Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 16(2), 305–319. https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v16i2.4118

Palguna, I. M. J., Sugiarta, I. N. G., & Widyantara, I. M. M. (2022). Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan oleh Seorang Ibu Terhadap Bayinya Setelah di Lahirkan. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 3(2), 352–357. https://doi.org/10.55637/jph.3.2.4943.352-357

Rasyidi, M. A. (2018). Fungsi Hukum di Dalam Masyarakat dan Peranan Hukum Bisnis di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.35968/jh.v9i1.301

Salim, H. (2019). Penelitian Pendidikan: Metode, Pendekatan, dan Jenis. Kencana. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=id&lr=&id=2fq1DwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR4&dq=Penelitian+Pendidikan:+Metode,+Pendekatan,+dan+Jenis+(Edisi+Pertama)&ots=wRjV92meLh&sig=C_sFa1Jo5jlmbIAekkldQp1LlOM&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Penelitian Pendidikan%3A Metode%2C Pendekatan%2C dan Jenis (Edisi Pertama)&f=false

Sarimanella, M. N., Adam, S., & Leasa, E. Z. (2022). Mekanisme Penggunaan Closed Circuit Television Sebagai Alat Bukti Petunjuk Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(7), 720–727. https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/tatohi/article/view/1133

Simanullang, M. T., Manullang, H., & Esther, J. (2022). Kedudukan Hasil Autopsi Sebagai Alat Bukti Pada Perkara Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan (Studi Di Kepolisian Ressor Pematang Siantar). NOMMENSEN LAW REVIEW, 1(1), 77–94. https://ejournal.uhn.ac.id/index.php/law_review/article/view/598

Suryadi, D., & Rahmat, D. (2018). Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Perkara Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana secara Bersama-Sama. Logika: Jurnal Penelitian Universitas Kuningan, 9(01), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.25134/logika.v9i01.894

Downloads

Published

2022-10-20

How to Cite

Priyono, B., Perdana, F. W. ., Irwan, I., Tungkup, D. L. ., & Miran, M. (2022). Penerapan Alat Bukti Petunjuk Oleh Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, 3(10), 1417–1423. https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v3i10.721