Analisis Kemampuan Bernalar dan Berpikir Kritis (Studi Komparatif antara Accountable Talk dan Higher Order Thinking Skill)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v3i04.577Keywords:
bernalar, berpikir kritis, HOTSAbstract
This article tries to unravel and reveal two methods that can lead to good conversation, deliver better understanding and develop reasoning and critical thinking skills, namely Accountable Talk and HOTS. The connection with the mind is how neatly arranged words based on good rhetoric can influence thoughts and even give birth to ideas. The purpose of writing this article is to explain the similarities and differences between accountable talk and higher order thinking skills by comparing them. The research method is using library research or library research, both from books and from research journals that are related to the discussion in this study. While the type or nature of this article is comparative descriptive. Accountability is defined as an ethical concept related to the ability to explain the decisions taken and activities carried out alias asked for reasons and accountability. Meanwhile, higher order thinking skills are the ability to connect, manipulate, and change their knowledge and experience critically and creatively in making decisions to solve problems in new situations.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Faiz Badridduja, Sidda Elvida, Eva Latipah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.