Comparative Strategy Analysis: Battle of Dien Bien Phu 1954 Vs General Attack 1 March 1949 Reflections on The History of Decolonization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v5i04.1080Keywords:
Battle of Dien Bien Phu, General Attack 1 Maret, DecolonizationAbstract
The article explores the strategic comparison between the Dien Bien Phu Battle in Vietnam and the General Offensive of 1 March 1949 in Yogyakarta, Indonesia, marking crucial points in the struggle against colonialism. It delves into the historical context, military strategies, and impacts of these battles, highlighting their significance in shaping history and decolonization. Both battles shared a striking strategic similarity: using surprise attacks to overcome stronger opponents. Despite occurring in different historical and geographical contexts, both battles showcased the effectiveness of tactical superiority in achieving significant victories and influencing broader political changes, even against seemingly unbeatable opponents. The analysis emphasizes the pivotal role of these battles in ending colonial dominance and accelerating the decolonization process in Vietnam and Indonesia.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Tri Yudha Ismanto, Eko Lutvie, Irdham Ahmad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
