State Legal Accountability for Alleged Genocide Against Rohingya Ethnic Group: Case Study of Myanmar Under the 1948 Genocide Convention
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v6i10.2021Keywords:
State responsibility, genocide, Rohingya, Myanmar, international law, ICJ, human rightsAbstract
This study examines state legal accountability for alleged genocide against the Rohingya ethnic group of Myanmar under the 1948 Genocide Convention within the framework of international law. It adopts a normative juridical approach with qualitative legal analysis to assess the extent to which Myanmar’s authorities meet the legal elements of genocide under the Convention and the scope of state responsibility in preventing and punishing such crimes. Through doctrinal interpretation and comparative jurisprudence from the ICJ, ICTR, and ICTY, the study clarifies normative accountability mechanisms in contemporary genocide cases. The Rohingya crisis demonstrates systematic violations of fundamental human rights, including mass killings, forced displacement, and denial of citizenship, revealing structural persecution and potential genocidal intent. The study emphasizes that state responsibility for genocide is erga omnes, binding upon the entire international community, thus allowing other states to demand accountability even when not directly affected. The case brought by The Gambia against Myanmar before the International Court of Justice highlights the critical role of international judicial mechanisms in enforcing state obligations under the Genocide Convention. However, political barriers, particularly within the UN Security Council, often impede the effective implementation of international norms. The paper concludes that Myanmar’s conduct toward the Rohingya aligns with the elements of genocide as defined by international law and underscores the necessity of strengthening enforcement mechanisms to ensure justice and prevent future atrocities.
References
Alston, P., & Goodman, R. (2020). International human rights: The successor to international human rights in context (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Bantekas, I. (2022). Principles of direct and superior responsibility in international humanitarian law.
Bianchi, A., & Peat, D. (2020). The Gambia v. Myanmar and the normative power of the ICJ. Leiden Journal of International Law, 33(4), 939–956. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156520000482
Billah, M. (2021). Prosecuting crimes against humanity and genocide at the international crimes tribunal Bangladesh: An approach to International Criminal Law standards. Laws, 10(4), 82.
Buchanan, C. (2020). The responsibility to protect and Myanmar: From humanitarian intervention to accountability. Global Governance, 26(4), 579–596. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02604005
Cassese, A. (2015). International criminal law: Cases and commentary (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Cheung, S. (2020). Myanmar, the Rohingya crisis, and the International Court of Justice. Asian Journal of International Law, 10(2), 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2044251320000127
Cheung, S. (2021). Rethinking accountability for atrocities against the Rohingya in Myanmar. Human Rights Review, 22(4), 493–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-021-00629-5
Clapham, A. (2021). Human rights: A very short introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Clark, R. (2021). The ICJ’s provisional measures in The Gambia v. Myanmar: A test of international law’s preventive function. Journal of Genocide Research, 23(3), 401–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623528.2021.1920951
D’Alessandra, F., & Whidden, G. (2023). Whither atrocity prevention at the UN? Look beyond R2P and the Security Council. Stimson Center.
Donnelly, J. (2019). Universal human rights in theory and practice (4th ed.). Cornell University Press.
Gaja, G. (2018). Obligations erga omnes in international law. Netherlands International Law Review, 65(2), 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40802-018-0113-1
Green, J. A. (2020). State responsibility and the Rohingya crisis: Exploring the limits of international accountability. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 25(3), 453–478. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/krz032
Green, P. (2020). Genocide, justice and accountability: Reflections on The Gambia v. Myanmar. Human Rights Review, 21(4), 473–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-020-00598-z
Green, P., MacManus, T., & de la Cour Venning, A. (2018). Countdown to annihilation: Genocide in Myanmar. International State Crime Initiative, Queen Mary University of London.
Hathaway, J. C., & Pobjoy, J. (2019). The law of refugee status and persecution under international human rights norms. International Journal of Refugee Law, 31(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eey034
Holliday, I. (2022). Myanmar’s state responsibility and the limits of global justice. Pacific Affairs, 95(2), 189–210. https://doi.org/10.5509/2022952189
Hossain, A. (2021). Say ‘NO’Racism towards Rohingya Refugee. International Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities (IJSSH), 6(1), 10–30.
Jarvis, S. (2025). Failure through consensus building: Rethinking the role of R2P. Journal of Global Security Studies.
Keane, D. (2022). The Rohingya crisis and the law of genocide. Human Rights Law Review, 22(2), 275–298. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngac013
Koester, C. (2021). Looking beyond R2P for an answer to inaction in the Security Council. Florida Journal of International Law. https://scholarship.law.ufl.edu
Leider, J. (2023). Myanmar’s Rohingya crisis in historical perspective: Politics, violence, and identity. Asian Affairs, 54(1), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/03068374.2023.2163859
Longobardo, M. (2025). The Monetary Gold Principle and States’ Obligations Triggered by a Serious Risks of Atrocities Being Committed by Another State: The Cases of the Duty to Prevent Genocide and the Duty to Ensure Respect for IHL. International Community Law Review, 27(3), 282–329.
Linton, S. (2023). Accountability for genocide: ICJ proceedings and the enforcement gap. International Criminal Law Review, 23(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123-bja10123
Mégret, F. (2022). The political life of human rights: Constructing the Universal Declaration. European Journal of International Law, 33(2), 389–412. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chac021
O’Brien, E. (2019). The Rohingya crisis and the international response: A case study in global governance failure. Third World Quarterly, 40(10), 1808–1827. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2019.1656064
Schabas, W. A. (2018). Genocide in international law: The crime of crimes (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Stensrud, E. E. (2024). Can small states save R2P from failure and oblivion? International Journal on Minority and Group Rights. Taylor & Francis Online.
Subramanian, S. R. (2022). UN Security Council and human rights: An inquiry into the legal foundations of the responsibility to protect. Utrecht Journal of International and European Law, 37(1), 20–40. https://utrechtjournal.org
Totten, S., & Bartrop, P. R. (2021). Reflections on the Rohingya genocide. Routledge.
Trahan, J. (2022). Why the veto power is not unlimited. Journal on the Use of Force and International Law.
Ullah, A. A. (2022). The Rohingya crisis: Identity, history, and implications for global governance. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 7(3), 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/20578911221080622
UNHCR. (2020). Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide: 70 years on. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. https://www.unhcr.org
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Marudut Parulian Silitonga, Rachmat Abdillah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
