Vol.4, No.06, Juni 2023
E-ISSN: 2723-6692
P-ISSN: 2723-6595
http://jiss.publikasiindonesia.id/
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, Vol. 4, No. 06, Juni 2023 563
Implementation of Investigations and Investigations in Revealing
Criminal Acts of Premeditated Murder
Agus Fahrur Rozi
1
, Faisal Santiago
2
, Megawati Barthos
3
1,2,3
Universitas Borobudur, Indonesia
1
2
,
3
Corresponding Author: [email protected]
ARTICLE INFO
ABSTRACT
Submitted
:22-04-2023
Received
:25-04-2023
Approved
:05-05-2023
Efforts to investigate and investigate the crime of premeditated
murder is regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP),
namely Law Number 8 of 1981, Article 1 points 1 and 2 formulate
the meaning of investigation. The reality on the ground shows that
the implementation of investigations and investigations in
uncovering cases of premeditated murder cannot be carried out
optimally because there are obstacles to the lack of witnesses and
evidence. The formulation of the problem in this study is: How is the
implementation of investigations and investigations in uncovering
cases of premeditated murder? The author uses an empirical
juridical approach, using primary and secondary data. Data analysis
using qualitative analysis. The results show that: The examination
cycle should be done expertly by agents in view of regulations other
than the Criminal Methodology Code which frames the legitimate
reason for specialists is Police Guideline (Perpol) Number 6 of 2019
concerning the Nullification of Perkap Number 14 of 2012
concerning The executives of Criminal Examination.
Keywords: Implementation;
Investigation; Criminal act;
Planned Murder.
Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)
1. Introduction
Indonesia as a protected state has a few kinds of regulations to control the activities
of its residents, including Criminal Regulation and Criminal Methodology Code. These two
regulations have an extremely cozy relationship on the grounds that fundamentally the law
of criminal strategy is remembered for the significance of criminal regulation (Mertokusumo,
2009) . It's just that criminal procedural law or what is also known as formal criminal law is
more focused on provisions governing how the state through its tools exercises its right to
convict and impose sentences. Meanwhile, criminal law (material) is more focused on the law
that regulates what crimes or actions can be punished with a crime determined by the law
and against whom such punishment can be imposed (Effendi, 2011).
e-ISSN: 2723-6692 🕮 p-ISSN: 2723-6595
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, Vol. 4, No. 06, Juni 2023 564
Criminal procedural law is the entire legal rule regarding how to implement criminal
law provisions, if there is a violation of the norms referred to by this provision. So that the
criminal procedural law was created as a means in the framework of law enforcement and
justice in realizing an orderly and peaceful life in society. The encapsulation of Indonesia as
a law and order nation is to make legal guidelines in which one of these regulations is the
Criminal Technique Code which is a rule for looking for and getting material truth, in
particular the total reality of a crook case by applying legitimate arrangements genuinely and
unequivocally, to figure out who the culprits are who can be accused of an infringement of
the law and afterward request an assessment and court choice to decide if it is demonstrated
that a wrongdoing has been perpetrated and whether the denounced individual can be
accused.
In the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), namely Law Number 8 of 1981, Article 1
points 1 and 2 define the meaning of investigation. Investigation of criminal acts is essentially
a law enforcement effort that is limited and restrains the rights of citizens, aims to restore
the disruption of the balance between individual interests and public interests so that a
situation of security and order is maintained and created because a criminal investigation is
also part of criminal law enforcement, it must be carried out based on the provisions and
regulations in force (Ali, 2022) .
Regulation infringement that have been overflowing in Indonesia of late are murders.
The meaning of homicide is a crook act that causes the passing of an individual's life,
presently, many killings happen in different locales of Indonesia. Aside from being impacted
by the intentions or foundation of the culprits, this is additionally a delineation of the ethical
downfall of this country. Moral decay, financial tension, anxiety, and contempt are a portion
of the variables that lead to killings. It's so natural for somebody to kill someone else, it merits
examining the reason. The cruelty of life and the delicacy of strict schooling may likewise be
a figure the way in which effectively one individual kills another (Gerungan, 2009).
The homicide was propelled by three intentions, in particular property or economy,
power, and social relations. One of these thought processes could be the justification for the
culprit to carry out murder. Murder can be brought about by things that are light and
unconstrained. For instance, on the grounds that the culprit's feelings are high to the point
that he has bruised eyes and carries out murder.
The expansion in criminal demonstrations requires the job and obligations of the
specialists including the Police, particularly the Criminal Examination Unit, in revealing the
reasons for murders carried out by culprits requiring difficult work from the Police. Aside
from the Police, another authority is the Principal legal officer's Office. Participation between
the Police and the Examiner's Office in settling cases assumes a significant part in criminal
policing.
A crook act is a demonstration that is denied by a law and order, which restriction is
joined by dangers (sanctions) as specific punishments, for any individual who disregards the
preclusion (Chazawi, 2002). The effect of a wrongdoing/infringement is criminal obligation,
while the meaning of criminal obligation is criminally liable for somebody who carries out a
lawbreaker act or criminal demonstration (Saleh, 1981). One of the crimes in murder cases
is premeditated murder. Homicide is an act of killing someone by violating the law.
Premeditated murder in the Criminal Code regulated in Article 340 is:
"Whoever deliberately and with prior planning takes the life of another person, is
threatened with premeditated murder, with the death penalty or life imprisonment or for a
specified period, for a maximum of twenty years."
Premeditated murder is the crime of taking the life of another human being, or killing,
after planning time or method, intending to ensure the success of the assassination or avoid
e-ISSN: 2723-6692 🕮 p-ISSN: 2723-6595
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, Vol. 4, No. 06, Juni 2023 565
capture (Anwar, 1979). Planned murder in regulation is by and large the most serious kind
of homicide, and the culprit is deserving of death.
The components of planned murder under Article 340 of the Lawbreaker Code are:
(Moeljatno, 2021)
1. Whoever is a legitimate subject where a lawful subject who can be considered
responsible as per criminal regulation is a characteristic individual, to be specific a
person.
2. Deliberately, the culprit has the will and conviction to cause specific results that have
been managed in regulation that is driven by the satisfaction of desire (thought
process).
3. By preparation, it really intends that there is a slack time among arranging and activity
which takes into consideration deliberate arranging first and afterward followed by
activity.
The problem in this paper is how is the investigation carried out in the crime of
premeditated murder
2. Materials and Methods
The strategy utilized recorded as a hard copy this applied paper is the distinct
scientific technique, specifically by utilizing information that obviously depicts the issues
straightforwardly in the field, then the examination is completed and finished up to tackle an
issue. Strategies for information assortment through perception and writing study to acquire
critical thinking in the planning of this paper(Purwati, 2020). In line with the research
objectives to be achieved, the realm of this research is included in the actual qualitative
examination, a qualitative approach method will be used. According to Petrus Soerjowinoto
et al., a qualitative method is a method that emphasizes the process of understanding
researchers on the formulation of problems to construct a complex and holistic legal
phenomenon (Soerjowinoto, 2006).
Regularizing juridical methodology, specifically the juridical methodology technique
used to look at issues from a lawful and legal viewpoint, namely rules that can be used as a
basis for studying problems and their legal consequences, in this case namely the Criminal
Code (KUHP) and the Criminal Code. The Criminal Methodology Code (KUHAP), as well as
Police Guideline (Perpol) Number 6 of 2019 concerning the Cancelation of Perkap Number
14 of 2012 concerning the Administration of Criminal Examination (Atikah, 2022).
The normative juridical approach is carried out on certain statutory regulations or
written laws related to the implementation of investigations into criminal acts of
premeditated murder (Soemitro, 1990). This study depicts the state of the article under
study, which focuses on regulation and the implementation of an investigation into the crime
of premeditated murder in practice.
3. Results and Discussions
3.1. Conducting Investigations in Exposing the Crime of Premeditated Murder.
The definition of an investigation is an effort made by the police as an investigator to seek
and reveal information or information about an event that is suspected of being a crime or
an event of a crime that is allegedly committed by someone whose identity is unknown, in
the case of an investigation, the investigator collects data or information that must be able to
reveal the actual perpetrators of law violators (Hartono, 2010).
According to Andi Hamzah, regarding investigations, the efforts of investigators to find
information and evidence of perpetrators of crimes that must be by laws and regulations, the
e-ISSN: 2723-6692 🕮 p-ISSN: 2723-6595
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, Vol. 4, No. 06, Juni 2023 566
sections of criminal procedural law that concern investigations are as follows:(Hamzah,
2010)
a. Provisions on investigative tools.
b. Provisions regarding knowing the occurrence of offenses.
c. Examination at the scene.
d. Summons of suspects or defendants.
e. Temporary detention.
f. Examination or interrogation.
g. Official report (search, interrogation, and on-site inspection).
h. Foreclosure.
i. Case aside.
j. Delegation of cases to the public prosecutor and returns to investigators for
completion.
The investigation is carried out immediately after there is a report or complaint of a
criminal act or knowing that a criminal act has occurred. Investigations by civil servant
investigators are given instructions by investigators from the Indonesian National Police.
situations need to be considered before investigation by members of the police because,
in the investigation of criminal acts of theft with violence, the efforts are different. This
situation, among other things, is if the identity of the perpetrator is unknown and the
perpetrator is caught red-handed. The following is the handling of a criminal act in its
jurisdiction:
a. The identity of the perpetrator is unknown.
1) Receiving reports about the occurrence of criminal acts.
Reports are divided into 2 types, namely, model A reports, reports submitted
by members of the police who know themselves about a crime, and model B
reports, namely reports made by members of the police based on what has been
submitted by a person, both a witness and a victim. The complainant is asked for
information such as how the incident started when it happened (tempus delicti),
where it happened (locus delicti), and what about the proof of ownership so that
it is clear whether it meets the elements of a crime.
2) Carry out the processing of the crime scene or TKP.
TKP processing is one of the investigative activities carried out for
identification, looking for witnesses who were at the TKP, looking for clues, and
making sketches of the circumstances at the TKP, so that it is clear what happened.
Identification is assisted by the reporter or victim. In this stage, investigators are
assisted by technological assistance or assistance.
3) Finding out how the modus operandi was carried out by the perpetrator.
After processing the TKP, members of the police then find out the modus
operandi used by studying the statements given by victims and witnesses and also
asking for statements from detainees and former detainees, especially detainees
and former detainees for premeditated murder.
4) Carry out investigations within the framework of investigations.
This investigation was carried out by a car detective or called a remove. At this
stage, the investigation is aimed at finding evidence of the investigation to find
and arrest the perpetrators of the crime of premeditated murder. These
investigative activities include observing, interviewing, stalking, undercover, and
recording conversations whether with permission or not. This activity was
carried out to gather information material. The search was carried out with the
assistance of an information network managed by Resmob. The information
e-ISSN: 2723-6692 🕮 p-ISSN: 2723-6595
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, Vol. 4, No. 06, Juni 2023 567
network managed by the Resmob consists of a network of inter-Polres or police
stations, a network of informants, and a network of the community.
5) The stage of the forced effort.
If during investigative activities within the framework of investigation
members of the police obtain initial evidence and find the perpetrators, then
forced measures are taken such as arrests, followed by searches and confiscation
of evidence related to premeditated murder.
Deliberate killing of someone else by the Lawbreaker Code is alluded to as murder. To
kill someone else's life, an entertainer should follow through with something or a progression
of activities that outcome in the passing of someone else on condition that the opzet
(purposeful) of the culprit must result as the demise of the other individual.(P.A.F Lamintang
dan Djisman Samosir, 2010)
From the description above, it can be seen that the crime of murder is a material offense,
meaning that a new offense can be considered as having been completed by the perpetrator
with the emergence of consequences that are prohibited or unwanted by law. Thus, it cannot
be said that a criminal act of murder has occurred if the result in the form of the death of
another person has not arisen.
Premeditated murder is regulated in the Criminal Code Article 340 which reads:
"Whoever deliberately and with prior planning takes the life of another person, is
threatened with premeditated murder, with the death penalty or life imprisonment or for a
specified period, for a maximum of twenty years."
As far as utilizing the term examination, the term analyst is all the more frequently
utilized where the significant errand is to get reports and sort out and stop individuals
associated with being analyzed. So it implies that this examination goes before the
examination. An examination is a demonstration that goes before an examination. In the
event that it is associated with the hypothesis of criminal procedural regulation as expressed
by Van Bemmelen, then this examination is the primary stage in the seven phases of criminal
procedural regulation, and that implies looking for reality.[11]
The investigation is an integral part of the field of investigation. As per the KUHAP
Execution Rules, an examination is one of the ways or techniques or sub-elements of an
examination that goes before different activities, as indicated by M. Yahya Harahap, an
examination can be likened with the idea of "analytical activity" as an endeavor to find follows
as data and proof of an occasion unendingly. which is suspected of being a crime.
The powers given by the Criminal Strategy Code to specialists are exceptionally
enormous, however close to the Criminal Technique Code, Police Guideline (Perpol) Number
6 of 2019 concerning the Nullification of Perkap Number 14 of 2012 concerning The
executives of Examination of Criminal Demonstrations likewise directs matters concerning
examinations that are specialized in nature and just applies inside to the police, and isn't
controlled by the Criminal System Code, so the Police Guideline (Perpol) Number 6 of 2019
Concerning the Nullification of Perkap Number 14 of 2012 Concerning The board of Criminal
Examination can be supposed to be a specialized aide for agents in doing examinations. In
light of Article 11 Section (1) Letter a says that an examination can be done before there is a
Police report/Objection and after there is a Police Report/Grumbling or in the structure of
an Examination so the examination capabilities to find out and figure out what occasions
occurred and is entrusted with making official reports and report which will frame the
premise of the underlying examination,
The examination is completed before the examination or can be done along with the
examination. Polri authorities responsible for completing examinations should conform to
the standards contained in Polri Guideline (Perpol) Number 6 of 2019 concerning the
Annulment of Perkap Number 14 of 2012 concerning the Administration of Examination of
e-ISSN: 2723-6692 🕮 p-ISSN: 2723-6595
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, Vol. 4, No. 06, Juni 2023 568
Criminal Demonstrations to be specific Legitimateness, Proficient, Corresponding,
Procedural, Straightforward, Responsible, Powerful, and Productive, and that implies that
agents should have the option to do their obligations properly and rapidly, every examiner
does their obligations as per their separate lawfulness and authority, specialists in doing
their obligations can't be mediated by anybody, each activity of the specialist focuses on the
rule of straightforwardness and is educational for the gatherings concerned, and specialists
can be considered responsible for their activities juridically, authoritatively and in fact.
The examination is the phase of settling a crook case after an examination which is the
underlying phase of looking for whether a wrongdoing has happened in an occasion. At the
point when it is realized that a wrongdoing has happened, then, at that point, that is the point
at which an examination can be done in view of the consequences of the examination. In
insightful activities, the accentuation is put on the demonstration of "looking and finding" an
"occasion" that is thought of or thought to be a crook act. While in examinations the
accentuation is put on the demonstration of "looking for and gathering proof".
The law gives unique honors or honors to specialists to do analytical capabilities like
calling, looking at, capturing, confining, seizing, and laying out an individual associated with
having carried out a wrongdoing as a suspect, however in completing these exceptional
freedoms and powers one should comply and dependent upon the guideline of the right of
fair treatment, specifically that everybody has the option to be endlessly examined on a
legitimate premise.
Article 109 of the Criminal Technique Code expresses that the continuous examination
process should be informed to the Public Examiner (hereinafter alluded to as the
Investigator) by sending a Notification of Initiation of Examination (SPDP). Examiners in
completing examinations should be founded on the law, implying that each move made by
agents should be founded on the law as has been specified in the Criminal Technique Code
and different regulations and guidelines.
The examination interaction should be completed expertly by agents in light of the
Criminal System Code which is the lawful premise and Police Guideline (Perpol) Number 6 of
2019 concerning the Cancelation of Perkap Number 14 of 2012 concerning the
Administration of Criminal Examination. One of the standards contained in the Police
Guideline (Perpol) Number 6 of 2019 Concerning the Annulment of Perkap Number 14 of
2012 Concerning The board of Criminal Examination is the Rule of Lawfulness, specifically
the course of examination and examination did by legal arrangements, examinations depend
on police reports and Examination Warrant.
Investigations in Perkap Number 14 of 2012 are divided into 4 (four) levels, namely:
1. Easy Things.
Simple cases have the qualities of adequate observers, adequate proof, the
suspect has been known or captured and the dealing with process is moderately
quick taken care of by the Sectoral Level Police (Polsek).
2. Medium Case
The moderate case has the qualities of adequate observers, there is proof
prompting the suspect's inclusion, the character and whereabouts of the suspect
are known and simple to capture, the suspect isn't important for a coordinated
wrongdoing bunch, the suspect's wellbeing isn't upset, doesn't need master
declaration yet assuming that essential specialists are not difficult to get a hold of.
Taken care of by police at the Hotel Police level (Polrest) and Polsek.
3. Difficult Matters.
Troublesome cases have the qualities of the observer not knowing
straightforwardly about the wrongdoing that happened, the suspect's personality
e-ISSN: 2723-6692 🕮 p-ISSN: 2723-6595
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, Vol. 4, No. 06, Juni 2023 569
being obscure or his wellbeing being debilitated or having a specific position, the
suspect is safeguarded by a specific gathering or part of the culprits of coordinated
wrongdoing, proof straightforwardly connected with the case is hard to get,
important master declaration can uphold exposure of cases, extraordinary gear is
required in taking care of cases, violations carried out happen in a few places and
require adequate examination time. Case dealing with is hard to do by police at the
Polrest and Provincial Police (Polda) levels.
4. Very Difficult Case.
Truly challenging cases have the qualities of not having found observers who
are straightforwardly connected with the wrongdoing, whereabouts of witnesses
are obscure, witnesses or suspects are abroad, crime locations are in a few
nations/cross nations, suspects are abroad and there is no removal understanding,
merchandise the proof is abroad and can't be seized, the suspect's personality is
obscure or his wellbeing is weakened or has a specific position and requires a
generally lengthy examination time. The examination was done by the Polda-level
police and the Indonesian Public Police Central command (Mabes Polri).
Police authorities who complete examinations should do case titles, case titles are
partitioned into two, specifically:
1. Title of Ordinary Case.
a. Case titles are generally completed at the underlying phase of an
examination to decide if the situation with a crook case is, figuring out an
examination plan, forming the components of the article formed, deciding
observers, suspects, and proof, deciding time targets, and insightful
strategies and strategies.
b. Case titles are normally done at the mid-phase of the examination cycle
which expects to assess and tackle issues experienced in the examination,
figure out the advancement of the examination accomplished and
endeavors to speed up the fruition of the examination, decide plans for
additional activity, guarantee similarity between witnesses, suspects, and
proof with the articles being referred to. thought, guaranteeing that the
execution of the examination is by the objectives set as well as creating
plans and targets of the examination.
c. Case titles are usually carried out at the final stage of an investigation to
evaluate the investigative process that has been carried out, solving
problems or obstacles to investigations, ensuring compatibility between
witnesses, suspects, and evidence, completing case files, determining
whether or not the case files are transferred to the public prosecutor or
terminated and or compliance with the prosecution's instructions.
2. Title of Special Case.
Unique case titles are completed to answer reports/grumblings or objections
from prosecutors or their legitimate guides after a request has been gotten from
the examiner's bosses as specialists, returning an examination that has been
suspended subsequent to getting new proof, deciding explicit police activities or
resuming an examination in view of a choice pretrial with super durable lawful
power.
Exceptional title cases are completed for specific cases with the thought that
they require the composed endorsement of the President/Priest of Home
Undertakings/Lead representative, are of broad public concern, and are in line
with specialists.
e-ISSN: 2723-6692 🕮 p-ISSN: 2723-6595
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, Vol. 4, No. 06, Juni 2023 570
Directing a case title at the last stage is a specialist's step prior to presenting
the case document to the Public Examiner or it is an agent's move toward
arranging moves toward satisfy the Public Investigator's Guidelines with the goal
that the case can be pronounced finished by the Public Investigator.
The process of investigative investigation and investigation in uncovering
cases of premeditated murder is as follows:
a. Receiving Reports.
By their obligations and commitments, the specialist should get a report in
regards to the event of a lawbreaker demonstration of planned murder. With
this report, the Police promptly inspected the journalist of the wrongdoing of
planned murder.
b. Take Action First.
In the wake of getting a report from the complainant, the specialist really
looks at the reality of the report or objection by checking at the scene. If indeed
a criminal occurrence has happened, then, at that point, assuming the suspect
is currently at that spot, the specialist might deny the suspect from leaving the
scene. Besides, the agent conducts important examinations including checking
the personality of the suspect or requesting individuals associated with
perpetrating the wrongdoing of planned murder to prevent and denying
individuals from entering and leaving the scene. Then, at that point, the agent
should attempt to find and gather data and proof used to carry out the
wrongdoing.
In the event that the assessment at the location of the occurrence has been
finished and the proof has likewise been gathered, then, at that point, a
temporary end should be drawn up. After the occurrence has been finished up,
the exploring official/examiner coordinates the proof that has been gathered
with one another. The matching of these pieces of evidence is very critical
because these pieces of evidence are very important in determining the proof
of the suspect's actions in court.
c. Arrest and Detention.
After the examiner/specialist gets a report or grumbling about the event of
a lawbreaker demonstration of planned murder, then, at that point, as a
continuation of a demonstration committed by somebody, assuming that the
examiner has some strong inclinations joined by adequate introductory proof,
the specialist might capture the suspect. In such manner, the examiner can
drive the type of capture and detainment, it should be founded on the
conviction that there is an assumption of culpability. It implies that the
specialist should have adequate starter proof and a solid claim that a
wrongdoing has been carried out before they choose to capture/confine.
Captures can't be done with no obvious end goal in mind, on the grounds
that doing so abuses basic freedoms. To capture somebody, the specialist
should give a capture warrant joined by the explanations behind the capture
and a concise portrayal of the idea of the wrongdoing being thought. Without
a capture warrant, the suspect can decline the official concerned. During
detainment, examiners from the police have worries that the suspect will take
off, harm, or vanish proof and decrease carrying out a wrongdoing (arranged
murder). For examination, assuming it just so happens, the suspect is truly
perpetrated the wrongdoing of planned murder in light of the proof adequate
starting proof or within the sight of bringing about conditions dread of the
e-ISSN: 2723-6692 🕮 p-ISSN: 2723-6595
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, Vol. 4, No. 06, Juni 2023 571
suspect getting away from will obliterate and dispose of proof and will rehash.
d. Foreclosure.
The motivation behind the seizure is important to give certainty to the
adjudicator that the suspect has carried out the wrongdoing. At the point when
an examiner is going to seize a thing of proof, he should initially show a letter
of verification of character, a letter of task, etc to the proprietor of the thing.
e. Examination of Suspects and Witnesses.
The assessment of suspects and witnesses is the main part or stage in the
examination cycle. From the suspect and witness, data will actually want which
will actually want to uncover everything about the wrongdoing that happened.
In such manner, before the assessment starts, the specialist needs to get ready
all that is required whether the analyst suspects or witnesses have been
designated, where the suspects or witnesses will be analyzed, and whether the
suspects or observers to be inspected have been brought under material
guidelines. In the event that the suspect is gathered, he should focus on the
sensible time span between the receipt of the request and the day of the
assessment. The individual who is gathered whether to hear his assertion as a
suspect or an observer should come. In the event that he doesn't come, he will
be gathered in the future with orders for the official/agent to be brought to
him.
For a suspect, before an assessment starts against him, the specialist should
inform him of his entitlement to get lawful help. The suspect's assertion was
heard without strain from anybody or in any structure. An observer is an
exceptionally conclusive piece of proof in the legal cycle. Since the observer is
somebody who can give data about wrongdoing that has happened, where he
heard, saw, and encountered the occasion himself. Witnesses are analyzed
independently however might be united with each other and they are obliged
to give genuine data.
f. End of Investigation.
In the wake of finishing every one of the expected minutes, the examiner
presents the case record to the public investigator which is an accommodation
in the main stage, in particular just the case document. Assuming the
examination led by the Polres is viewed as complete, the agent will surrender
liability regarding the suspect and proof to the examiner's office. Assuming the
Investigator's Office feels that the aftereffects of the examination end up being
inadequate, the Examiner's Office promptly returns the case document.
4. Conclusion
The examination of the culprits of the wrongdoing of planned murder alludes to
Article 7 of the Criminal Methodology Code (KUHAP), and Police Guideline (Perpol) Number
6 of 2019 concerning the Annulment of Perkap Number 14 of 2012 concerning The
executives of Criminal Examinations. The investigation process can only be carried out if the
investigator himself knows or has received the report. The process of investigation into the
crime of premeditated murder is as follows: a) Receiving Reports; b) Take the First Act; c)
Arrest and Detention; d) Foreclosure; e) Examination of Suspects and Witnesses; f) End of
Investigation.
5. References
e-ISSN: 2723-6692 🕮 p-ISSN: 2723-6595
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, Vol. 4, No. 06, Juni 2023 572
Ali, M. (2022). Dasar-dasar hukum pidana. Sinar Grafika.
Anwar, M. (1979). Hukum Pidana Bagian Khusus (KUHP Buku II). Alumni.
Atikah, I. (2022). Metode Penelitian Hukum.
Chazawi, A. (2002). Pelajaran Hukum Pidana Bagian I, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Effendi, E. (2011). Hukum Pidana Indonesia: Suatu Pengantar. Refika Aditama.
Gerungan, W. A. (2009). Psikologi Sosial Cet. II; Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.
Hamzah, A. (2010). Asas-asas Hukum Pidana edisi revisi 2008. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Hartono, P. (2010). Penegakan Hukum Pidana melalui Pendekatan Hukum Progresif. Sinar Grafika,
Jakarta.
Mertokusumo, S. (2009). Hukum acara perdata Indonesia.
Moeljatno, S. H. (2021). KUHP (Kitab undang-undang hukum pidana). Bumi Aksara.
P.A.F Lamintang dan Djisman Samosir. (2010). Delik-delik Khusus Kejahatan yang Ditujukan Terhadap
Hak Milik dan lain-lain Hak yang Timbul dari Hak Milik. Tarsito.
Purwati, A. (2020). Metode penelitian hukum teori & praktek. Jakad Media Publishing.
Saleh, R. (1981). Perbuatan pidana dan pertanggungan jawab pidana: Dua pengertian dasar dalam
hukum pidana. Aksara baru.
Soemitro, R. H. (1990). Metodologi penelitian hukum dan jurimetri. Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, 167.
Soerjowinoto, P. (2006). Buku Pedoman Metode Penelitian Karya Hukum & Skripsi. Semarang: Fakultas
Hukum Unika Soegijapranata.