e-ISSN: 2723-6692 p-ISSN: 2723-6595
Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 9, September 2024 2333
student surveys, and interviews with teachers. These qualitative methods were employed to gain
insights into students' engagement, attitudes towards the instructional approach, and perceived
benefits of the morphology lessons. This combination of methods allowed for a comprehensive
evaluation of both the cognitive outcomes and the affective responses of the students to the
instructional program.
During the pre-test, students were initially divided based on gender in order to gather data on
each student's proficiency in comprehending the idea of English morphology. From the results of the
pre-test analysis that have been stated in the article entitled Morphological and Syntactical Errors of
Junior High School Students with Different Sex in Speech Production by Zaniar et al. (2024), it can be
concluded that female students have improved grammatical proficiency in English, both in written
and spoken form, in comparison to male students. In addition, female students employ a wider variety
of vocabulary in comparison to those who are men. As well been said, the wide range of speech,
language, and communication abilities across individuals in the general population is primarily
caused by the engagement of several regions in the brain, intricate cognitive and motor functions, the
lengthy duration needed to develop these skills, and major impacts from the environment. Although
there are variations among individuals, there is a persistent pattern of gender disparities (Sá-Leite &
Lago, 2024). Epidemiological studies indicate that boys are more susceptible to communication,
language, and speech deficits compared to girls, who demonstrate faster and more efficient
development of these skills. Neurological research indicates that the male brain is more vulnerable to
conditions that impact communication networks. Studies suggest that sex hormones and variations
in brain structure and activity play a role in these variances, granting women a biological edge in
developing communication and language abilities. Nevertheless, the precise mechanisms responsible
for this benefit are still not well understood.
Accordingly, following the pre-test, we promptly implemented various instructional
approaches in two subsequent sessions (meetings), which encompassed interactive activities and
collaborative learning. During interactive activities, several exercises such as morpheme matching
games, word-building exercises, and sentence construction assignments will be employed to enhance
the learning process. On the other hand, the Collaborative Learning Group teamed up with the English
teacher of SMP Al Falah, who instructs grade 7 students, to conduct a peer teaching session
(Sulistyawati et al., 2021). Moreover, the first meeting agenda are pre-test and giving an overview of
morphemes, introducing the inflectional morphemes and comparing it into the derivational
morphemes. Then, in the second meeting, it focuses on the practical application, playing games,
review of the material, post-test and giving evaluation and provision of feedback. The objective of this
session was to stimulate student discussions and application of morphological rules, thereby
promoting a more profound comprehension through this collaborative effort.
Results and Discussions
The results and discussion section provides a comprehensive analysis of the data collected
during this present study, highlighting key findings and their implications. the section is categorized
into pre-test analysis, quantitative findings, qualitative findings, instructional approaches, post-test
results and discussion.
Results
The pre-test examination was conducted to assess the initial aptitude of the students in
comprehending and applying morphological ideas. The data was examined using descriptive and
inferential statistics, uncovering significant findings regarding the students' skills. The preliminary
examination revealed disparities in grammatical aptitude and vocabulary utilization based on gender,
which aligns with the discoveries made by Zaniar et al. (2024). Female students had superior aptitude
in both written and spoken English, as well as a more extensive lexicon in comparison to male
students (Talerico, 2007).