Vol. 5, No. 9, September 2024
E-ISSN: 2723-6692
P-ISSN: 2723-6595
http://jiss.publikasiindonesia.id/
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, Vol. 5, No. 9, Month 2024 2245
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Criminal Liability; Corporate
Crime
This study explores corporate criminal liability in the context of
Indonesiaโ€™s legal system, focusing on the complexities arising from
corporate crime enforcement. Corporate crime, involving illegal
activities by business entities for profit, requires a distinct legal
approach since corporations as legal subjects cannot be held
accountable in the same way as individuals. The research reviews
various laws, including the Limited Liability Company Law and the
Anti-Corruption Law, examining the challenges in applying these
regulations, particularly in proving corporate intent and
responsibility. Using a normative legal research method, the study
analyzes legal documents and case studies to understand how
Indonesia handles corporate crime. The findings reveal significant
enforcement difficulties due to overlapping legal frameworks, gaps
in corporate oversight, and insufficient legal mechanisms.
International comparisons, such as the U.S. doctrine of "vicarious
liability," highlight the potential for stronger corporate governance
in Indonesia. The study concludes that harmonizing regulations
and strengthening law enforcement are critical to improving
corporate criminal liability in Indonesia, with recommendations for
better compliance systems and enhanced international
cooperation.
Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)
Introduction
In the traditional legal system, criminal liability is often directed at individuals. However,
developments in the business world show that unlawful acts are often carried out by corporations
as entities. This poses a challenge in enforcing the law because corporations are not individuals but
a collection of people and assets (Anjari, 2016; Naldo et al., 2022).
The concept of corporate criminal liability requires a different approach than that of
individuals. Corporations, as legal entities, must be considered legal subjects who can be held
accountable for criminal acts. This approach requires changes in the legal framework to ensure that
corporations can be subject to appropriate sanctions. Corporations are legal institutions and non-
Criminal Liability in The Perspective of Corporations' Crimes
Endang Rusyana, Januar Agung Saputera
Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Jakarta, Indonesia
Email: [email protected]m, januar.agung@uta45jakarta.ac.id
Correspondence: darusyana@gmail.com
*
e-ISSN: 2723-6692 ๐Ÿ•ฎ p-ISSN: 2723-6595
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, Vol. 5, No. 9, Month 2024 2246
legal entities consisting of individuals with the same status in the law as persons and can carry out
legal actions (Widyaningrum & Wijaya, 2022).
In general, problems in criminal law are about criminal acts, criminal liability, and
punishment. The definition of criminal liability is the responsibility of a person for the criminal acts
he commits (Ali, 2022), criminal liability determines whether a person can be held criminally
accountable for his actions (Sianturi & Kanter, 1996).
The ability to be responsible can be interpreted as a psychological state that can justify
applying a criminal effort, as seen from a general perspective and from the person. A person is
considered to be responsible for his actions when: (Andrisman, 2009)
1. He can know or realize that his actions contradict the law.
2. He can determine his will according to his consciousness.
In addition to individuals, along with the development of the times and technological
advances that go hand in hand with economic development, a crime can now be committed by
corporate entities. The development of information technology is accelerating in various
civilizations, not only in developed countries but also in developing countries (Siregar et al., 2024).
Corporations as legal subjects are recognized through Supreme Court Regulation Number 13 of
2016 concerning Procedures for Handling Corporate Crime Cases (Perma No. 13 of 2016) (Azhar &
Mahyani, 2022).
Law enforcement for corporate crime can be viewed according to at least three main factor
approaches, namely: 1) the allocation of responsibility for corporate crimes must be based on the
understanding that corporate actions are not just the sum of the actions of individuals in a
corporation, but must be seen as being in the form of actions of the corporation itself; 2) Allocation
of Responsibility for Corporate Crimes must be able to allocate the responsibility to each party,
either individuals, corporate sub-units, corporations, holding companies, industry associations or
those whose duties are to supervise corporations such as accountants and regulators; and 3) the
allocation of responsibility to individuals must be able to avoid the possibility of victimization of
certain parties as scapegoats (Wibisana, 2016).
Corporations are entities that play an important role in the global economy. However, as
economic activity increases, there is potential for corporations to engage in crime, either directly or
indirectly. Corporate crime can majorly impact society, the environment, and the economy, so it is
important to understand and regulate criminal liability for corporations that violate the law
(Shanty, 2017).
Several countries have developed legal systems that allow corporations to be criminally liable.
For example, the United States and some European countries have specific provisions in their laws
to address corporate crime. These provisions include heavy fines, operational restrictions, and even
the dissolution of corporations.
Although Indonesia already has a legal framework that allows corporations to be prosecuted,
implementing corporate criminal liability still faces various challenges. These include a lack of
understanding of the prosecution mechanism and obstacles in proving corporate involvement in a
criminal act (Melani & Agustini, 2021).
Law enforcement against corporations also requires a more proactive approach, including in-
depth investigations and evidence gathering. In addition, cooperation between various law
enforcement agencies and regulators is needed to ensure that corporate crimes can be followed up
effectively.
Corporate criminal liability must also consider the prevention aspect. Corporations must be
encouraged to implement effective internal control and compliance systems to prevent law
violations. This can include employee training, code of conduct implementation, and periodic audits.
e-ISSN: 2723-6692 ๐Ÿ•ฎ p-ISSN: 2723-6595
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, Vol. 5, No. 9, Month 2024 2247
Corporate criminal liability has become a critical area of concern as corporations play
increasingly prominent roles in economic activities. The expansion of corporate influence has
brought with it a rise in corporate crimes, where entities engage in illegal activities to gain financial
benefits. Unlike individual crimes, corporate crimes present unique challenges in law enforcement
due to the complexity of corporate structures and the difficulty in assigning responsibility. This
raises the need for a clear legal framework that holds corporations accountable for their actions.
The specific issue that this study addresses is the inconsistency in how corporate criminal
liability is regulated and enforced in Indonesia. While the legal system acknowledges corporate
entities as legal subjects, there are gaps in the implementation of these laws, particularly regarding
the allocation of responsibility within the corporation. Corporate decision-making often involves
multiple actors, which complicates the process of determining criminal intent and culpability.
Current legal provisions such as the Limited Liability Company Law and the Anti-Corruption Law
offer frameworks for corporate criminal liability, but their application has been inconsistent, leading
to challenges in prosecuting corporate crimes effectively. The specific problem this study seeks to
address is the misalignment between existing laws and the practical difficulties of law enforcement
in cases involving corporate crime.
The urgency of this research lies in the increasing frequency and scale of corporate crimes in
Indonesia, which pose significant threats to economic stability and public trust. High-profile cases,
such as the PT Jiwasraya financial scandal, have revealed significant weaknesses in Indonesia's legal
and regulatory frameworks. The failure to hold corporations fully accountable not only undermines
the rule of law but also affects victims, including the general public, who suffer from corporate
misconduct. Moreover, the global shift towards corporate accountability, exemplified by
international legal frameworks like the U.S. "vicarious liability" doctrine, puts additional pressure
on Indonesia to align its legal system with international standards. This research is urgent because
it contributes to the ongoing discourse on improving corporate governance and ensuring legal
mechanisms that effectively deter corporate crime.
This research provides a novel approach by critically examining the gaps in Indonesiaโ€™s
corporate criminal liability laws and comparing them with international practices. While previous
studies have explored corporate crime in general, this study focuses specifically on the
inconsistencies within Indonesiaโ€™s legal framework and its implications for law enforcement. By
incorporating a comparative analysis with countries like the United States and European nations,
where corporate criminal liability is more clearly defined, this research offers new insights into how
Indonesia can strengthen its laws. Additionally, the study goes beyond a purely legal analysis by
suggesting practical reforms, including better coordination between regulatory bodies and
improved compliance systems within corporations. This differentiates the research from earlier
studies that primarily focused on theoretical aspects of corporate crime.
In conclusion, the research seeks to address the critical gaps in Indonesiaโ€™s approach to
corporate criminal liability. By highlighting the specific problems, emphasizing the urgency, and
presenting a novel perspective, this study aims to contribute to the development of a more robust
legal framework that can effectively deter and prosecute corporate crimes in Indonesia.
With the increase in regulations and law enforcement, it is hoped that corporations can
operate more responsibly and by the law. This protects the community's interests and supports a
healthy and sustainable business climate (Shanty, 2017).
Materials and Methods
This study uses a normative approach that analyses legal concepts and laws and regulations
related to corporate criminal liability. This approach involves a literature study of legal documents
e-ISSN: 2723-6692 ๐Ÿ•ฎ p-ISSN: 2723-6595
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, Vol. 5, No. 9, Month 2024 2248
such as laws, regulations, court decisions, and relevant academic literature. This study also uses
descriptive-analytical methods to describe and analyze the application of criminal law against
corporations in Indonesia. Data was collected through document studies and analyzed qualitatively
to explore challenges and opportunities in law enforcement against corporate crimes. The results of
this analysis are expected to provide insight into the effectiveness of the existing legal system and
provide recommendations for developing a more effective legal framework in dealing with
corporate crime.
Result and Discussion
Criminal Liability System for Corporate Law Subjects
The criminal liability system for corporations recognizes that corporations can act through
their representatives and be liable for criminal acts that benefit the entity. In Indonesia, despite the
existence of legal frameworks such as the Limited Liability Company Law and the Corruption Crime
Law, their implementation still faces challenges, especially in proving and determining corporate
malicious intent. Sanctions that can be imposed include fines, operational restrictions, or even
dissolution, aiming to provide a deterrent effect and encourage behavior change (Sjawie, 2018).
Corporate management plays an important role in prevention through an effective
compliance and internal oversight system. Proof requires evidence that the criminal act was
committed by or on behalf of the corporation and provides benefits to the corporation.
Internationally, approaches to corporate crime vary, with some countries imposing direct
responsibility on corporations while others focus on the individual responsibilities of
administrators (Kurniawan & Hapsari, 2022).
As legal entities, corporations have a significant role in the global economy and often act
through representatives to achieve their business objectives. This creates the need for a criminal
liability system that can overcome legal problems arising from actions taken by or on behalf of
corporations.
In Indonesia, regulations regarding corporate criminal liability are regulated in various laws,
such as the Limited Liability Company Law and the Corruption Crime Law. However, implementing
these regulations is often faced with technical and legal challenges, especially in proving the direct
involvement of corporations in a criminal act (Nasution, 2015).
Corporate criminal liability is based on the principle that an entity can have an intention or
mens rea through the collective actions of its management. This means that unlawful acts
committed for the benefit of a corporation can be considered a corporate act itself.
Sanctions that can be imposed on corporations include significant fines, restrictions on
operational activities, revocation of business licenses, or even dissolution of corporations. These
sanctions are designed to deter and encourage behavior change in corporate business operations.
Proof in corporate criminal cases requires a different approach than in individual criminal
cases. This involves gathering evidence that shows the criminal act was committed by a corporation
representative and provided benefits to the corporation.
Corporate management is responsible for preventing corporate crime by implementing
internal oversight systems and strict compliance. Negligence in supervision can be the basis for
corporate criminal liability, emphasizing the importance of responsible leadership (Mahmudah,
2022).
Different countries internationally take different approaches to dealing with corporate crime.
For example, in the United States, prosecutions may be more aggressive with the doctrine of
"vicarious liability," while other countries may focus more on individual liability. This approach
e-ISSN: 2723-6692 ๐Ÿ•ฎ p-ISSN: 2723-6595
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, Vol. 5, No. 9, Month 2024 2249
shows the need for the right strategy in dealing with corporate crime in accordance with each
country's legal context.
The criminal liability system for corporate legal subjects is designed to overcome criminal
acts committed by business entities. This concept differs from individual liability because a
corporation is a legal entity with no physical form. Therefore, the system focuses on actions taken
by or on the corporation's behalf, including management decisions and operational activities.
It is important to understand that corporations can be considered legal subjects who can be
held liable for criminal acts. This is based on the principle that corporations have a separate legal
identity from their shareholders and management. Therefore, illegal acts committed by agents or
employees of corporations in their capacity can bind such corporations in criminal liability.
This system involves identifying individuals acting on behalf of corporations. Senior
management and key decision-makers are often the focus of criminal investigations against
corporations. This aims to ensure that those who have the power in decision-making and the
company's direction are also responsible for illegal actions (Retnowinarni, 2019).
The implementation of a corporate criminal liability system often involves sanctions, such as
fines, business restrictions, or corrective actions. Fines can be imposed significantly to prevent
future violations, while business restrictions may include prohibitions on certain activities or
industries. Corrective actions can involve changes in organizational structure or policies to prevent
repeated violations.
Implementing this criminal liability system also requires cross-border cooperation, especially
in the case of multinational corporations. International law and bilateral treaties often enforce
criminal liability and ensure corporations cannot evade sanctions simply by operating in various
jurisdictions. This shows the importance of global coordination in enforcing criminal law for
corporations.
Application of the Law on Corporate Crimes Applicable in Positive Law in Indonesia
In Indonesia, the legal basis for corporate criminal liability is regulated in various laws, such
as the Criminal Code, Law No. 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Law, and sectoral laws,
such as the Environment Law and the Law on the Eradication of Corruption. This principle allows
corporations to be prosecuted as legal subjects subject to criminal sanctions (Kartika, 2015).
The main legal basis for corporate criminal liability in Indonesia is regulated in the Criminal
Code (KUHP), specifically through Articles 67 to 74. These articles regulate the possibility of
corporations as perpetrators of criminal acts, with the principle that corporations can be considered
legal subjects subject to criminal sanctions. The Criminal Code provides a general framework for
understanding how corporations can be involved in criminal acts and how accountability can be
exercised.
In addition to the Criminal Code, Indonesia's criminal procedure law also includes regulations
regarding corporations in Law No. 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Law. The law
provides guidelines on the prosecution and evidentiary process in corporate cases, ensuring that
fair legal procedures are applied. This criminal procedure law facilitates law enforcement by
stipulating how cases involving corporations should be processed, from investigation to trial
(Santoso, 2016).
In the sectoral context, various special laws, such as Law No. 32 of 2009 concerning
Environmental Protection and Management and Law No. 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of
Corruption Crimes, also include provisions for criminal acts committed by corporations. This law
provides an additional and specific basis for dealing with violations in the environmental and
e-ISSN: 2723-6692 ๐Ÿ•ฎ p-ISSN: 2723-6595
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, Vol. 5, No. 9, Month 2024 2250
corruption sectors, showing that corporate criminal law in Indonesia does not rely on only a single
source of law but also on relevant sectoral regulations.
The application of corporate criminal law is based on the principle that corporations can be
held responsible for criminal acts committed by their management or employees. This liability
arises if the action is carried out for the corporation's benefit or within the scope of its work. This
principle ensures that corporations cannot avoid responsibility simply by blaming individuals.
The principle of corporate criminal liability in Indonesia refers to the concept that
corporations as legal entities can be subject to criminal sanctions for criminal acts committed by
individuals acting on behalf of or for the corporation's benefit. This principle is based on the theory
that although a corporation is a non-physical entity, it can carry out legal actions and can, therefore,
be subject to legal liability. In this case, actions taken by the management, manager, or employee in
their official capacity can bind the corporation (Prasetyo et al., 2017).
Corporate criminal liability requires proof that the criminal act was committed for the benefit
or within the scope of the company's duties. This means that if an employee or administrator
commits a criminal act that benefits the corporation or in the course of carrying out their duties,
then the corporation can be considered liable. This is different from individual criminal liability,
where only individuals who commit criminal acts can be sanctioned.
This principle also underlines the importance of accountability in corporate management.
Corporations must have adequate internal systems and controls to prevent criminal acts from
occurring. If corporations fail to implement adequate prevention and control systems, then they can
be considered negligent in their legal obligations, and this can be the basis for criminal liability. This
principle encourages corporations to be more proactive in ensuring that their operations are in
accordance with the law and do not violate applicable legal provisions.
Sanctions that can be imposed on corporations in Indonesia include fines, freezing or revoking
business licenses, and corrective actions. Fines can be the main punishment that provides a
deterrent effect. Additionally, corrective actions require corporations to change business policies or
practices so as not to violate the law in the future.
Types of Sanctions for Corporations in Criminal Law in Indonesia (Prasetyo et al., 2017).
1. Fines
Fines are the main sanctions imposed on corporations as financial punishment for
violations committed. These fines are designed to provide a deterrent effect and prevent the
recurrence of similar violations in the future. The amount of fines is determined based on the
level of errors and losses caused, as well as the financial capacity of the corporation. Significant
fines can affect a corporation's financial stability and encourage changes in their business
practices.
2. Freezing or Revocation of Business License
This sanction involves temporarily freezing or permanently revoking the corporate
business license. The freezing of business licenses can be applied as a temporary measure to
stop corporate operations until corrective actions are taken. Meanwhile, revoking a business
license is a severe punishment that results in corporations being unable to operate legally in
their business field. Both sanctions aim to ensure that corporations comply with the law and
cannot continue with unlawful activities.
3. Corrective and Supervisory Measures
In addition to fines and revocation of permits, corporations may be subject to sanctions in the
form of the obligation to take corrective actions, including changes in internal policies,
organizational structures, or operational procedures. The court may order corporations to
improve their internal control systems, conduct independent audits, or periodically report on the
e-ISSN: 2723-6692 ๐Ÿ•ฎ p-ISSN: 2723-6595
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, Vol. 5, No. 9, Month 2024 2251
progress of improvements. These corrective actions aim to prevent future violations and ensure
continued compliance with the law. In addition, continuous supervision by legal authorities can
also be applied to monitor the implementation of corporate improvements and compliance.
4. Asset Confiscation
Asset confiscation sanctions can be applied to confiscate corporate goods or assets that are
directly related to the criminal act committed. It aims to return profits from illegal actions to
the state or victims. Asset confiscation can also reduce the capacity of corporations to continue
illegal activities and ensure that the profits from criminal acts are not used to strengthen
unlawful business operations.
5. Restitution and Compensation Obligations
In addition to fines and asset confiscation, corporations may be required to pay restitution
or compensation to victims of criminal acts. This includes the payment of compensation for
losses incurred by the illegal actions of corporations. This obligation aims to provide recovery
to the victim and acknowledge the corporation's responsibility for the negative impact of the
crime committed.
6. Prohibition of Engaging in Certain Activities
Another sanction that can be applied is prohibiting corporations from engaging in certain
types of activities or specific industries. This can include a ban on operating within sectors
related to the infringement committed or a ban on carrying out certain business activities
considered high risk. These sanctions prevent corporations from engaging in activities that
could lead to further violations of the law and protect the public from potential negative
impacts.
These types of sanctions reflect efforts to enforce criminal law against corporations in a
comprehensive and effective manner, ensuring that unlawful actions are responded to with
appropriate consequences while encouraging future improvement and compliance.
The law enforcement process for corporate crimes involves investigations by law
enforcement officials, such as the police and prosecutors, and can continue to the courts. This
process requires proof that the criminal act was committed by, for, or on behalf of the corporation.
Cooperation between law enforcement agencies is also important for the effectiveness of this legal
process (Rodliyah et al., 2021).
The law enforcement process against corporate crimes in Indonesia begins with an
investigation by law enforcement officials, such as the police or prosecutors. This investigation aims
to gather evidence showing the involvement of corporations in criminal acts. During this stage, the
authorities will identify key individuals within the corporation who may be involved in illegal acts,
such as administrators, managers, or employees, and analyze relevant documents and transactions.
After the investigation, the case can be submitted to the prosecutor's office for follow-up with
the prosecution process. The prosecutor will decide whether there is enough evidence to proceed
with the case to court. If so, they will draft an indictment that includes allegations against the
corporation and the individuals involved. The trial process then takes place in court, where
evidence will be presented, and legal arguments will be discussed to determine whether the
corporation is guilty.
If the corporation is found guilty, the court will impose sanctions according to the type of
violation committed. The process also includes the possibility of an order for corrective action,
ongoing supervision, and monitoring to ensure compliance with the court's decision. Once the
sanctions are imposed, the enforcement process continues with the implementation of the
sanctions, which involves oversight by the relevant authorities to ensure that the corporation
e-ISSN: 2723-6692 ๐Ÿ•ฎ p-ISSN: 2723-6595
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, Vol. 5, No. 9, Month 2024 2252
complies with the remediation order and does not engage in further violations (Rodliyah et al.,
2021).
The application of corporate criminal law faces challenges, including the complexity of
corporate structures and the difficulty of proving malicious intent. To overcome this, it is necessary
to strengthen regulations and increase the capacity of law enforcement officials. In addition,
improving the legal framework and international cooperation are also important in handling cases
of corporations operating across borders.
Challenges and Developments in Law Enforcement of Corporate Crimes in Indonesia
(Mahmudah, 2022).
1. Complexity of Corporate Structure
One of the main challenges in corporate criminal law enforcement is the complexity of
corporate structure and operations. Large corporations often have complex organizational
structures and many branches or subsidiaries, making identifying and tracking criminal acts
difficult. It also creates challenges in determining individual responsibility and ensuring that
criminal acts are not hidden within a wide network of businesses.
2. Proof and Legal Process
Proving a criminal act involving a corporation is often difficult because it requires evidence
of the corporation's direct involvement. Gathering evidence linking illegal actions to
management decisions or corporate policies can be a long and complicated process.
Additionally, legal proceedings in court often take a long time, which can hinder effective law
enforcement.
3. Improving Regulations and Law Enforcement Capacity
Developing a legal system to handle corporate crimes requires improving regulations and
increasing the capacity of law enforcement officials. Today, existing legal frameworks and
procedures may not be fully adequate to meet the challenges of modern corporate complexity.
Increasing capacity, training, and resources for law enforcement officials is essential so that
they can handle corporate cases more efficiently. Additionally, revisions and updates to
regulations to adapt to the latest business practices and technologies will help strengthen the
law enforcement system.
To overcome these challenges, legal systems must be developed and international
cooperation must be developed. The legal system must be updated to align with current business
practices and technology and correct weaknesses in existing regulations. International cooperation
is very important because many corporations operate in different countries, so criminal acts
involving corporations often involve cross-border jurisdictions. Bilateral agreements and
cooperation between law enforcement agencies in different countries will strengthen law
enforcement efforts and prevent violations involving multinational corporations.
The use of technology and innovative approaches can also help in corporate criminal law
enforcement. Implementing technology-based audit systems, big data analysis, and artificial
intelligence (AI) can simplify the process of investigating and monitoring corporate crimes. This
technology allows the identification of patterns and anomalies that may indicate violations of the
law and increases efficiency and effectiveness in handling corporate cases (Nasution, 2015).
The corporate case study that occurred was the PT Jiwasraya Case (2019-2020). PT Jiwasraya,
the state-owned insurance company in Indonesia, was involved in a major financial scandal that
resulted in billions of rupiah in losses. This case includes misappropriation of customer funds and
manipulation of financial statements carried out by the company's senior executives. In addition,
there are allegations of corruption and bribery against officials to get support for adverse
investment activities.
e-ISSN: 2723-6692 ๐Ÿ•ฎ p-ISSN: 2723-6595
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, Vol. 5, No. 9, Month 2024 2253
The Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) and the Financial Services Authority (OJK)
investigated this case. The investigation revealed the involvement of several executives and officials
in the misappropriation of funds and manipulation of reports. The suspects face charges of fraud,
embezzlement, and corruption.
As a sanction, PT Jiwasraya was fined and required to compensate customers for losses, as
well as improve the financial management system. The executives involved were sentenced to
prison and required to pay fines. This case also triggered reforms in Indonesia's insurance industry
and financial management.
The case of PT Jiwasraya emphasizes the importance of transparency and accountability in
managing customer funds. Strict law enforcement and regulatory reforms aim to prevent similar
cases from occurring in the future and improve integrity in the financial sector.
Conclusion
Corporate criminal liability in Indonesia reflects ongoing efforts to enforce laws against
business entities involved in illegal acts, emphasizing that corporations, as legal subjects, can face
criminal sanctions for offenses committed by individuals within the corporation. This assigns
responsibility to both the individual perpetrators and the corporate entity they represent. The
enforcement of corporate criminal law involves a complex process, including investigations,
prosecutions, and court proceedings, with sanctions such as fines, license revocations, and
corrective measures aimed at deterring future violations. The main challenges in this process stem
from the complexity of corporate structures and the difficulty in gathering sufficient evidence. To
address these challenges, it is crucial to develop the legal system and enhance law enforcement
capabilities through improved regulations, better training for officials, and the use of advanced
technology. Additionally, international cooperation is essential to tackle transnational corporate
crimes. A comprehensive, integrated approach can strengthen corporate criminal liability, promote
legal compliance, and safeguard the public interest.
References
Ali, M. (2022). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana. Sinar Grafika.
Andrisman, T. (2009). Hukum Pidana: Asas-Asas Dan Aturan Umum Hukum Pidana Indonesia.
Universitas Lampung.
Anjari, W. (2016). Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana. Jurnal Ilmiah
Widya Yustisia, 1(2), 116โ€“121.
Azhar, D. P., & Mahyani, A. (2022). Pertangungjawaban Pidana Korporasi sebagai Pelaku Tindak
Pidana Penyebaran Data Pribadi. Bureaucracy Journalโ€ฏ: Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-
Political Governance, 3(1), 340โ€“558.
Kartika, A. (2015). Implementasi Criminal Policy Terhadap Pertanggung Jawaban Kejahatan
Korporasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum, 2(2), 193โ€“209.
Kurniawan, K. D., & Hapsari, D. R. I. (2022). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Menurut
Vicarious Liability Theory. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 29(2), 324โ€“346.
https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol29.iss2.art5
e-ISSN: 2723-6692 ๐Ÿ•ฎ p-ISSN: 2723-6595
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, Vol. 5, No. 9, Month 2024 2254
Mahmudah, N. (2022). Illegal Fishing: Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi di Wilayah Perairan
Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.
Melani, N., & Agustini, S. (2021). Kejahatan Korporasi: Pertanggungjawaban Tindak Pidana dalam
Hukum Positif Indonesia. Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia, 4(2), 736โ€“748.
Naldo, R. A. C., Purba, M., & Pasaribu, I. (2022). Perlunya Penerapan Pertanggungjawaban Mutlak
Terhadap Korporasi Sebab Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Menimbulkan Ancaman Serius. Penerbit
Enam Media.
Nasution, E. S. (2015). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian
Uang. Jurnal Mercatoria, 8(2), 132โ€“144.
Prasetyo, R. T., Maโ€™ruf, U., & Mashdurohatun, A. (2017). Tindak Pidana Korporasi Dalam Perspektif
Kebijakan Formulasi Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah, 12(4), 727โ€“741.
Retnowinarni, R. (2019). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Korporasi di Indonesia. Perspektif
Hukum, 82โ€“104. https://doi.org/10.30649/ph.v19i1.161
Rodliyah, R., Suryani, A., & Husni, L. (2021). Konsep Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi
(Corporate Crime) Dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Journal Kompilasi Hukum, 5(1),
191โ€“206. https://doi.org/10.29303/jkh.v5i1.43
Santoso, M. A. (2016). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pencemaran Lingkungan Hidup yang dilakukan
oleh Korporasi. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v7i2.1912
Shanty, L. (2017). Aspek Teori Hukum dalam Kejahatan Korporasi. Palar: Pakuan Law Review, 3(1).
Sianturi, S. R., & Kanter, E. Y. (1996). Asas-asas hukum Pidana di Indonesia dan Penerapannya (Cet
IV). Alumni Ahaem Peteheam.
Siregar, D. Y., Christiawan, R., & Saputera, J. A. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Nasabah Pemilik
Anjungan Tunai Mandiri (ATM) sebagai Korban Tindak Pidana Skimming. Jurnal Hukum
Kaidah: Media Komunikasi Dan Informasi Hukum Dan Masyarakat, 23(3), 243โ€“258.
Sjawie, H. F. (2018). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi pada TIPIKOR. Kencana.
Wibisana, A. G. (2016). Kejahatan Lingkungan oleh Korporasi: Mencari Bentuk Pertanggungjawaban
Korporasi dan Pemimpin/Pengurus Korporasi Untuk Kejahatan Lingkungan di Indonesia.
Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan, 46(2).
Widyaningrum, T., & Wijaya, H. (2022). Pengaturan Pidana Korporasi Terhadap Produksi Obat yang
Tidak Memenuhi Standar Persyaratan Keamanan di Indonesia. JIM: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa
Pendidikan Sejarah, 8(4), 4381โ€“4391.