e-ISSN: 2723-6692 🕮 p-ISSN: 2723-6595
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, Vol. 5, No. 5, May 2024 1241
percentage of palm kernel shell ash and superplasticizers. This is because superplasticizers that work
on fresh mortar ECC mortar can reduce the surface tension between cement particles and aggregates
so as to increase ductility and flow. Likewise for EM and TEM specimen codes. Then for testing the
average diameter on fresh mortar ECC mortar, the average diameter for Type-I was obtained with the
AME specimen code 0% greater than the AME specimen code 5% and AME 10% and the average
diameter of the AME specimen code 15% was the smallest. The same thing in Type-II with EM
specimen code and Type-III with TEM specimen code obtained EM 0% has an average diameter
greater than EM 5%, 10% and 15%. The 0% TEM specimen code has a larger diameter than the 5%,
10% and 15% TEM specimens. This result shows that the amount of palm kernel shell ash that is
increasing in the fresh mortar of ECC mortar will absorb water and make the average diameter that
occurs decrease.
4. Conclusion
Based on the results of research that has been conducted, it can be concluded that the role of
superplasticizers on the workability of fresh mortar ECC mortar due to an increase in the percentage
of palm kernel shell ash is very influential. This is seen by using the same cement water factor but the
amount of addition of palm kernel shell ash (ACS) up to 15% and superplasticizer (SP) is only 3.40%,
but the workability that occurs is still good. The largest flowability value (T500) for the 15% TEM
specimen code was 1.39 seconds and the lowest value for the 0% EM specimen code was 0.28 seconds.
The largest average diameter for 0% AME specimens is 106.5 cm and the lowest for 15% EM
specimens is 88 cm.
5. References
Astm, C. (1999). 494 “Standard Specification for Chemical Admixtures for Concrete” Annual Book of
ASTM Standards, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Concrete and Mineral Aggregates,
Philadelphia, PA, USA. American Society for Testing and Materials, 4(2), 251–259.
Efnarce, S. (2002). Guidelines for self-compacting concrete. London, UK: Association House, 32, 34.
Faqihuddin, A., Hermansyah, H., & Kurniati, E. (2021). Tinjauan Campuran Beton Normal dengan
Penggunaan Superplasticizer Sebagai Bahan Pengganti Air Sebesar 0%; 0, 3%; 0; 5% Dan 0, 7%
Berdasarkan Berat Semen. Journal of Civil Engineering and Planning (JCEP), 2(1), 34–45.
Handayani, A. S., Ratnawati, R., Septevani, A. A., Prasetyanto, Y. E. A., Khumaeroh, K., Syabila, A. N., &
Sunardi, N. A. (2023). Pengembangan Produk Silika Nano Partikel Berbasis Abu Boiler Cangkang
Sawit (Palm Kernel Shell ash) Untuk Aplikasi Biomedik [Laporan Penelitian dan Pengembangan].
Institut Teknologi Indonesia.
Harmiansyah, H., Dari, P. W., Wahyuni, S., Rahmawati, S. D., Wati, N. M. T., & Putri, A. K. (2023).
Karakteristik arang dari cangkang kelapa sawit sebagai bahan dasar utama pembuatan
biobriket. Sultra Journal of Mechanical Engineering (SJME), 2(1), 29–36.
https://doi.org/10.54297/sjme.v2i1.442
Lepech, M. D., Li, V. C., Robertson, R. E., & Keoleian, G. A. (2008). Design of green engineered
cementitious composites for improved sustainability. ACI Materials Journal, 105(6), 567–575.
Mulyono, T. (2007). Teknologi Beton. Andi Offset.